Marc's Discussions (99)

Discussions Replied To (50) Replies Latest Activity

"The debate is whether recitals of prior reservations fall within the subject of the…"

Marc replied Apr 3 to Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56

62 Apr 3
Reply by Marc

"Jay: Stop harassing me."

Marc replied Apr 2 to Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56

62 Apr 3
Reply by Marc

"So clearly, you're familiar with the most recent decision on the Wiseman case? You c…"

Marc replied Mar 28 to Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56

62 Apr 3
Reply by Marc

""no real legal clue"? Perhaps you should take a mulligan like the Wiseman v. Potts j…"

Marc replied Mar 28 to Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56

62 Apr 3
Reply by Marc

"what speaks volumes is that their was zero confusion about who owns what until very…"

Marc replied Mar 28 to Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56

62 Apr 3
Reply by Marc

"Agreed Marcus: Jay is one of those people who ruins these discussion boards for ever…"

Marc replied Mar 28 to Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56

62 Apr 3
Reply by Marc

"Trial judges are wrong all the time. Why else do you suppose we have appellate court…"

Marc replied Mar 28 to Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56

62 Apr 3
Reply by Marc

"LOL nothing in the Dodd case requires you to track down heirs from deaths in the ear…"

Marc replied Mar 28 to Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56

62 Apr 3
Reply by Marc

"you see that's wrong. if that was the intent they would have written the minerals "v…"

Marc replied Mar 28 to Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56

62 Apr 3
Reply by Marc

"Jay, I would be interested to know what analysis you see in the Wendt v. Dickerson…"

Marc replied Mar 28 to Dormant Mineral Statue - 5301.56

62 Apr 3
Reply by Marc

RSS

advertisements