Tags:
Permalink Reply by Calla Sommer on March 5, 2013 at 4:16pm
Permalink Reply by Thomas Moss on March 5, 2013 at 5:37pm $4500-$6000 a acre next to a plugged well. this is going to be interesting.
Permalink Reply by JODI on March 6, 2013 at 5:39am
Permalink Reply by James McDowell on March 6, 2013 at 6:27am
Permalink Reply by JODI on March 6, 2013 at 6:58am
Permalink Reply by JODI on March 6, 2013 at 10:13am
Permalink Reply by Billy Park Whyde on March 6, 2013 at 10:24am This statement .” Producing natural gas and natural gas liquids, the sites failed to produce crude oil which is more profitable in today’s economy." Hmm well then why are the biggies so H bent on the wet gas areas? Why is it that they are not H bent on the oil window? Could it be that they may be afraid of market saturation that might lower oil prices, as they have with natural gas?
Permalink Reply by Marcus Grayson on March 6, 2013 at 10:28am If they produced 1 MCF of gas and 1 bbl of NGLs then they produced gas and wet gas. Can't make your money back off of extremely low production. So again what came out is irrelevant if none of it was profitable. It wasn't profitable, obviously. You don't P&A good wells.
Permalink Reply by JODI on March 6, 2013 at 10:40am
Sign up for updates on local & national discussions and headlines in the shale industry. Stay informed!
8 members
129 members
168 members
267 members
136 members
118 members
110 members
62 members
324 members
131 members
Stay Connected
Like Us
Follow Us
Subscribe
Join our lists
© 2013 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Tools & Apps |
Copyright © 2012 GOMarcellusShale.com
advertisements

