Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by David Perotto on April 6, 2012 at 7:09pm

Tom,
The antis are in denial, probably putting heat on the EPA. That would explain the due diligence that they now must do.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Thomas J Shepstone on April 6, 2012 at 9:01pm

Yep, that's about it!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jack Straw on April 6, 2012 at 7:58pm

Anti-Fracing is a religious cult; it is perpetuated on the basis of dogma – it is not and will not be swayed by fact, science or reason.

Anti-Fracers are immunized against logic, mired in loathing of the human race and the technology that has brought comfort and prosperity.

 

All IMHO,

                 JS

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by gary smith on April 6, 2012 at 8:31pm

jack, your opinion is fraught with fact.  imho.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by HB on April 6, 2012 at 11:16pm

Exactly!  well put.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jack Straw on April 7, 2012 at 1:03am

Source: http://www.cagle.com/2012/04/contamination/

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by 2s72s0k9mm8gd on April 7, 2012 at 10:39am

Exactly on target....BULLSEYE!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ji on April 7, 2012 at 11:58am

just out of curiosity are you saying that what happened in Dimock had nothing to do with oil and gas drilling?       

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jack Straw on April 7, 2012 at 12:57pm

Not sure as to whom you directed you query.

I am not saying that what happened in Dimock had nothing to do with oil and gas drilling.

Numerous agencies that are staffed with credentialed experts in such matters (in a number of independent studies) are saying that what happened in Dimock had nothing to do with oil and gas drilling and fracing of the Marcellus Shale.

Only a fool would ignore such a preponderance of Scientific evidence; but there seem to be a lot of fools out there.

Personally, I believe that what happened in Dimock was due to an accidental release of rancid "Fairy Dust".

 

All IMHO,

                JS

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by gary smith on April 7, 2012 at 1:15pm

now you'll have the gays after ya.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ji on April 7, 2012 at 2:31pm

That's what I expected.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jack Straw on April 7, 2012 at 2:42pm

Glad that I could clear that up for you.

 

JS

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page