Tags:
Permalink Reply by Kathleen on July 16, 2012 at 3:38pm
Permalink Reply by Buell Well on July 16, 2012 at 5:43pm Obviously, my point is not to suggest ODNR is lax, but to prove it's not their job to ensure property rights are being respected (as somebody suggested it was), let alone offer redress when a credible allegation of property violation is made. That job is left to judges and the courts, which is why it's simply amazing to read a few posters whine about the Buell lawsuit and somehow claim to be pro-property rights. As if they would stand pat and do NOTHING when the law said that their property rights were being violated. Nobody really believes that.
Permalink Reply by Buell Well on July 16, 2012 at 5:45pm Also, I'm impressed you made it to page 26! What a boring document.
Permalink Reply by Kathleen on July 16, 2012 at 6:08pm
Permalink Reply by Buell Well on July 17, 2012 at 11:51am Also note how "oil and gas affidavit received" is not checked on page six.
Permalink Reply by Billy Park Whyde on July 17, 2012 at 12:35pm I would think that perhaps it might be a good idea to point out the pitfalls of this process and in creative criticism suggest changes to the ODNR with copies going to the governors office as well as legislators.
Sign up for updates on local & national discussions and headlines in the shale industry. Stay informed!
2 members
131 members
418 members
218 members
324 members
212 members
620 members
117 members
60 members
158 members
Stay Connected
Like Us
Follow Us
Subscribe
Join our lists
© 2013 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Tools & Apps |
Copyright © 2012 GOMarcellusShale.com
advertisements

