Gross Proceeds vs. Gross Proceeds with Market Enhancement actual royalty proceeds payments statement

Is anyone willing to share information, knowledge and actual deductions which are being taken from them with a Gross Proceeds at the Wellhead vs. Gross Proceeds with the Market Enhancement clause.  It would be very interesting and knowledgeable if different lease could be shared for the same pooled area or well to see the actual advantage or disadvantage of gross proceeds at the wellhead vs. the gross proceeds with the market enhance clause.  There has to be some quite a few of these pooled areas or leases which have a these two different types of royalty structures in place and do a comparison among the pooled area owners.

It would be interesting to see how the gross proceeds price at the wellhead is determined and how it "holds up" or compares to the determined value at the wellhead when the gross proceeds with the market enhancement clause is used.

Can anyone share their actual data or scenerios ?  Royalty owners, landmen, producers, or anyone else, this is an opportunity to share you opinions, actual data or knowledge with your partners or future partners in teaming together and benefiting us all.

Thank you in advance for any responses and feedback.

Views: 244

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You need to go after Gross Royalty with no deductions in your lease, then see what your producer uses to short you royalties.

They could use the bogus sale at the well head, then deduct Production Costs, Pipeline Use, or Enhancement clauses.

No producer is going to pay you what is in your lease. Sorry, the laws don't apply to O&G companies when they don't follow a contract/lease for some strange reason $$$$.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service