Three notable recent wells completed by Chesapeake in the Ohio Utica are as follows:
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Bluflame on October 10, 2012 at 12:38pm Mr. U.S.,
Thanks for your diligence! ODNR needs you. UR the best!
BLUFLAME
Permalink Reply by CAM on October 8, 2012 at 10:49pm James, here is a Google Earth Map with the Zimnox well yellow-pinned for you. Hope this helps.
Permalink Reply by martin on September 18, 2012 at 8:00am
Permalink Reply by gary SWF on September 20, 2012 at 2:56am You might try this site......http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/tabid/23014/default.aspx may not have excatly what you are looking for...............
Permalink Reply by Dan on September 20, 2012 at 5:30am Penn State MCOR has this map showing the wet-dry boundary on their maps resources page, but it doesn't show how far west the wet gas extends from that boundary before it transitions to oil. The energy-geologist's online journal searchanddiscovery.com has this thermal maturity map of the Marcellus included with an article called "Marcellus Shale – Geologic Controls on Production". It would appear from these sources that the Marcellus in Jefferson County would not be dry gas.
Permalink Reply by martin on September 20, 2012 at 8:19am
Permalink Reply by gary SWF on September 20, 2012 at 8:55am The Ohio site I believe has a thickness map....I don't think is very thick in alot of Ohio....It also shows western boundry............Gary
There are five (5) Marcellus Shale Horizontal wells IN-PRODUCTION in Ohio ...
1) 2006-08-05 = North American Coal well in Jefferson County
2) 2006-08-16 = Boan/Marcum well in Belmont County
3) 2011-03-13 = Ormet well in Monroe County
4) 2011-10-21 = Bucey well in Carroll County
5) 2012-08-05 = Eisenbarth in Monroe County
There are two (2) DRILLED Wells ...
1) Porterfield Gas Unit A
2) Porterfield Gas Unit B
Five (5) more wells are PERMITTED
Three (3) wells - the Permit EXPIRED
Permalink Reply by gary SWF on October 8, 2012 at 8:41am Any info on production from these wells?.......... Thanks In Advance
Permalink Reply by Aaron Brown on September 20, 2012 at 9:21am I do know that as of early 2012 CHK had no interest in leasing Marcellus strata in southern central Columbiana county.
Aaron,
Maybe, because of the production, or lack thereof, from the Marcellus Horizontal Well on the Bucey pad in Carroll County?
A very interesting "note" regarding the Bucey Wells ...
There is a Utica Horizontal well pipe directly below the Marcellus Horizontal well pipe !!! In March 2013, It will be very interesting to compare production results from the Utica well vs Marcellus well given the identical alignment and proximity to each other.
Permalink Reply by Aaron Brown on September 20, 2012 at 2:56pm Utica Shale, I'm guessing you are correct, thats the reason. I wonder if CHK will do the same "Marcellus over Utica" horizontal from the Burry pad? What is magical about the March 2013 date you reference?
246 members
221 members
107 members
151 members
59 members
419 members
125 members
178 members
112 members
168 members
Stay Connected
Like Us
Follow Us
Subscribe
Join our lists
© 2013 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Tools & Apps |
Copyright © 2012 GOMarcellusShale.com
advertisements

