Go Marcellus Shale

All things pertaining to the Marcellus & Utica Shale

In Part:

The U.S. Energy Department cut its estimate for natural gas reserves in the Marcellus shale formation by 66 percent, citing improved data on drilling and production.


The U.S. Geological Survey said in August that it would reduce its estimate of undiscovered Marcellus Shale natural gas by as much as 80 percent after an updated assessment by government geologists.


Sorry I do not believe this at all! A scheme to try and pull investors out of the gas? With the bull crap of carbon credits and the like it makes one question what (supposedly government) our government is doing.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-01-23/u-s-cuts-estimate-for-m...

Views: 5690

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Well, if you believe this, then you believe all the myriad numbers the gov't entities produce, such as inflation, CPI, joblessness, debt, you name it.

Yes, we must remember it is an election year.  I'm not which political side this would benefit.  It depends on who's spin doctor is better.  66% does sound like a rather large adjustment by experts who were supposed to be right on their calculations LAST year.

You are all having enduring tendencies to experience negative emotional states.........

Next it'll be those damn black helicopters are back now  with chinise pilots dropping landmen to secure rights from you, me and my red(-state) brothers.

Resevior characteristics become less speculative as the field data increases.

Is that conspiratorial or scientific?

All we are saying is give peace a...........Capitalism is corrupted by money.

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks, Billy,

This is just more of "The sky is falling" propaganda - I don't know their point & don't even care to try and guess. I just know that I'm leased, in a 640 acre production unit, with a completed pad, just waiting for the rig. So I guess my Marcellus Shale Gas has been discovered... lol

...and as long as gas is below $3 - it doesn't bother me if they just let it stay in the ground a little longer - or until the market comes up and the price stablizes - hopefully a little better than the value right now.

Congratulations to ya! 

The article says 141 trillion feet can be recovered and that's the important number.  When the scientists said there's 500 trillion cubic feet in the Marcellus, they said 50 trillion was recoverable.  So, 141 is much better than 50 in terms of what's recoverable.....IMO, this was a perfectly timed story to squeeze the short sellers in the nat gas market.  If you look at a multi-year chart, we touched or traded slightly below the low price during 2009.  That's a double bottom in my book that will have enduring significance.

Make sure you understand what this article was all about:  Money.  The story was planted by powerful players in the commodities markets who have access to the media.  And if you think this doesn't happen on a regular basis, go rent the movie "Trading Places".

It"s sad that we have a government that noboby trusts. No-one really beleives anything they say. There s always  a scheme of some kind behind their statements.

bo we havent been able to believe are goverment for 40 yrs now. it just another day

Nail squarely on the head.

When they say "technically recoverable gas" they mean what can be recovered using current techniques at at current prices.  With gas prices so low right now, it is not feasible to extract a lot of gas that will be later worthy of extracting when gas prices rebound to $6 or more.  And new techniques will greatly increase what is recoverable.

Less = more.       Less gas = more $.            less gas = cha ching!!!!!!!!    Supply and demand!

RSS

Join a Group & Get Connected Locally

© 2012   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service