Tags:
Permalink Reply by Todd Charles on June 23, 2011 at 12:56pm These "appointed" Marcellus Committee Members have vested and direct interests in the Oil & Gas Industry :
How many Rights or Surface Owners are fully represented and appointed to this committee ?
Permalink Reply by gasoholic on June 23, 2011 at 6:26pm Conflict of interest, very well could be. As for the ones who own mineral rights, I would like to think they would have a better understanding as to what the land and mineral owners are up against. Being against "Forced Pooling" and or not allowing it to be a part of this is a good start.
The ones who favor "Forced Pooling" and want it in, then yes, it is a hugh conflict of interest !
Ireland says "Forced Pooling" would become a "poison pill" in any regulatory bill it was in.
Facemire stated "Forced Pooling" didn't belong in a regulatory bill.
http://dailymail.com/News/statenews/201106221190
See "Forced Pooling" comments on pg. 2
Permalink Reply by gasoholic on June 27, 2011 at 7:33pm
Permalink Reply by gasoholic on July 22, 2011 at 4:21pm
Permalink Reply by gasoholic on July 22, 2011 at 6:32pm 422 members
254 members
329 members
271 members
36 members
153 members
216 members
59 members
294 members
246 members
Stay Connected
Like Us
Follow Us
Subscribe
Join our lists
© 2013 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Tools & Apps |
Copyright © 2012 GOMarcellusShale.com
advertisements

