Permalink Reply by Black Gold Junkie on June 4, 2012 at 5:03pm
Permalink Reply by Marcus Grayson on June 4, 2012 at 9:38pm I think they didn't include Richland because they already assigned most (if not all) of their leasehold to Devon. I'm waiting for Anadarko to come up your way. It just shocks me that all of the majors are just ceding the entirety of the western/southwestern part of the oil window to DVN. How brilliant will DVN look when they get good production numbers while everyone else is spending like drunken sailors in the rest of the state?
Permalink Reply by Black Gold Junkie on June 4, 2012 at 9:43pm
Permalink Reply by Bluflame on June 5, 2012 at 9:08am Marcus,
In my opinion, many O&G companies haven't yet perfected the way to maximize horizontal shale well oil production. I think I remember reading in a Devon announcement that they believe they've devised a method of opening and retaining the openings in the shale crevices to promote oil flow. Although it seems to be more of a fracking issue.
Maybe that explains why Devon has become a factor in the oil region???
BluFlame
Permalink Reply by JODI on June 5, 2012 at 9:13am
Permalink Reply by Black Gold Junkie on June 5, 2012 at 5:16pm
Permalink Reply by JODI on June 6, 2012 at 4:37pm yea, i tried. nothing. just one extension signed this year. i assume all the old cgas leases and enervest leases are now CHK. thats the only way they could have 4000 plus acres here.
Permalink Reply by Ron XXXXXX on June 5, 2012 at 10:24am from what I heard CHK is overleveraged right now so they need to sell off some things to raise some cash,
they are a little short on cash right now
there will be some restructuring with the company but next year at this time watch their stock take a huge jump
from near $17 now to way over $28 maybe $30 or even $50
Permalink Reply by Marcus Grayson on June 5, 2012 at 10:42am They have a ~$12 billion debt to service, their corporate bonds are rated at junk status (BB+), their best assets are in nat gas, they're out of hedge for 2012, which means they are subject to the market and their production numbers have been underwhelming in most of their major plays. There is no reason to believe that their stock is worth $30 let alone $50. If they slip much further they're an excellent takeover target by a real, actual major.
Permalink Reply by Black Gold Junkie on June 5, 2012 at 11:16am
Permalink Reply by Ron XXXXXX on June 5, 2012 at 11:18am AFTER they restructure (by next year) I think there will be reason for their stock to be at $30 or $50
Permalink Reply by Marcus Grayson on June 5, 2012 at 1:50pm I rode the wave once already, BGJ. I sold at $32 and took my gains. Then I shorted at ~$21 and covered it at ~$16. I should have waited to cover a little longer, it would have been around $15, but I was too scared to be greedy. Mark-to-market only works if the SEC doesn't investigate your claims of EUR. If they did then CHK would be in serious trouble.
Sign up for updates on local & national discussions and headlines in the shale industry. Stay informed!
118 members
17 members
246 members
129 members
168 members
267 members
136 members
110 members
62 members
324 members
Stay Connected
Like Us
Follow Us
Subscribe
Join our lists
© 2013 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Tools & Apps |
Copyright © 2012 GOMarcellusShale.com
advertisements

