Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Lou is on June 16, 2014 at 10:39am

http://http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/04/13/agenda-21-t...

If they are not going to make enough $$ they are not going to drill. Plain and simple. Read an objective take on Agenda 21.

Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on June 16, 2014 at 11:12am

There's that also (economics) for sure.

Thanks for the link.

Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on June 16, 2014 at 12:12pm

Lou,

Can't get the link to work on my mobile.

Went to The Daily Beast but cant get to theirsearch buttob.

From that I take it that you have to be a member / subscriber to do a search.

I'll keep trying / perhaps you can suggest a solution ?

Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on June 16, 2014 at 5:15pm

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/04/13/agenda-21-the-un-c...

Finally got the above link to connect to your reference.

Hope it won't be truncated when this reply posts.

Sounds pretty radical pros and cons alike.

Everyone needs to be their own judge on whether it's a good or bad international 'Agreement'.

I think it's bad as it represents to me a sharing of our wealth - internationally.

Other nations don't pay for our land / pay our taxes - why do we have to share what we own ?

I don't think we should be made to.

On top of it all it appears to me to be throwing a monkey wrench into Utica development as they attempt to maneuver for even more control over private investment - wasting valuable time.

Is our government driving business or is business driving business or is it a cooperative effort on behalf of both ?

I don't know ...... does anybody ?

Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on June 16, 2014 at 8:07pm

Losers are the domestic economy, therefore the general public and of course land owners owning minerals and or mineral owners.

Why give ourselves away?

WTF ?

Not making sense at all to me.

How about every one else on this site ?