Permalink Reply by Carol M. on February 2, 2011 at 9:14pm
Permalink Reply by Karl Anderson on February 2, 2011 at 9:27pm Carol
I would appreciate. Thanks very much.
karl
Permalink Reply by Bert Bankovic on February 3, 2011 at 2:41pm My data is only up until June 2010.
| COUNTY | ORG_NAME | PERMIT_NUM | FARM_NAME | WELL_NUM | GAS_QUANTITY | GAS_QTY_UNITS | Op Days |
| FOREST | PA GEN ENERGY CO LLC | 053-29488 | WARRANT 5508 | 2366 | Mcf | ||
| FOREST | PA GEN ENERGY CO LLC | 053-29381 | WARRANT 5508 | 2365 | Mcf | ||
| FOREST | PA GEN ENERGY CO LLC | 053-29019 | WARRANT 5103 | 2124 | 216617 | Mcf | 309 |
| FOREST | PA GEN ENERGY CO LLC | 053-29376 | WARRANT 5103 | 2367 | Mcf | ||
| FOREST | SENECA RESOURCES CORP | 053-29489 | SENECA TIMBERLAND | 39189 | Mcf | ||
| FOREST | SENECA RESOURCES CORP | 053-29710 | SENECA TIMBERLANDS 3H | 50167 | Mcf |
Permalink Reply by Michael A. Braymer, Esq. on February 7, 2011 at 10:26am
Permalink Reply by Karl Anderson on February 7, 2011 at 8:31pm Michael:
Thanks for your reply. I have a little over a hundred acres near Whig Hill. According to the DEP, there is an active well near the State Police barracks on Hwy. 36. There is talk of more wells on the same pad.
Do you have any knowledge or experience as to whether recent sales of mineral rights for the 1,500 foot wells include language wherein there is also a sale of deep mineral rights? Catalyst has purchased a lot of sub-surface mineral rights in our area ~ however, I have not seen their contracts. Such provisions could be easily added (?) and have profound impact on the landowners.
Karl
Permalink Reply by Michael A. Braymer, Esq. on February 8, 2011 at 10:14am Karl,
As I am sure you are aware there is still a significant amount of shallow oil & gas drilling going on in Forest County. DEP issued 489 non-marcellus convential permits in 2009 in Forest County and another 287 in 2010. Catalyst is not on DEP's Acitve Marcellus Producers list and my experience with them is that they are mostly active in non-marcellus.
Most of the recent leases I have seen in Northwestern Pa, initially being offered from companies seeking to produce from other formations and not seeking to procuce from the Marcellus still did NOT include a provision that excluded out the production from the Marcellus. Obviously everyones situation and circumstatnces are different and if the leases are recent and were reviewed by an exerienced O&G attorney there is a chance that some of the leases may have excluded out the Marcellus and other non-conventional shale formations.
Sign up for updates on local & national discussions and headlines in the shale industry. Stay informed!
60 members
158 members
212 members
246 members
65 members
225 members
568 members
125 members
218 members
267 members
Stay Connected
Like Us
Follow Us
Subscribe
Join our lists
© 2013 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Tools & Apps |
Copyright © 2012 GOMarcellusShale.com
advertisements

