Shell reps has just come through to get permission for seismic testing. I'm not leased (total surprise to them...I guess landowners aren't the only ones kept in the dark!), so I said no. I said I would be interested in leasing, and they said Shell would get back to me soon.
Does anyone know Shell's current standard offer? The last I heard (late last year) it was $2000/acre, 15% royalty. And they have addendums for C&G rollbacks, no storage, and some other environmental ones. I want to be prepared when they call to get the best deal. I'd like to hold out for a higher royalty; I know that Shell has bought/taken over leases with royalties as high as 20%. As I've written before, I'm in a pretty good position where it would be difficult for Shell to totally ignore my property. I want a deal, but I want better than their standard offer: now is my chance. Any ideas?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by paleface on June 20, 2011 at 5:14pm
Permalink Reply by Lynn Wigglesworth on June 20, 2011 at 5:27pm
Permalink Reply by Ann Ticopa on June 20, 2011 at 5:43pm Consider that it wasn't necessarily the truth that the siesmic landman didn't know you aren't leased. I was told that my property was down on East's records as having been leased. Iirc, it was the next day that a leasing landman from Long/East came calling ... for the first time.
Not saying you shouldn't ask for a higher royalty, but gascos do have a history of being more generous with each other than they are with individual landowners.
Good luck to you!!!
Permalink Reply by paleface on June 20, 2011 at 7:00pm
Permalink Reply by Lynn Wigglesworth on June 20, 2011 at 7:06pm
Permalink Reply by Brian V. on June 20, 2011 at 9:18pm East. Shell. Same thing. For what it's worth it's still Long Consulting doing the lease, seismic and title ground work for Shell.
Permalink Reply by Lynn Wigglesworth on June 20, 2011 at 9:43pm
Permalink Reply by Ann Ticopa on June 20, 2011 at 10:32pm
Permalink Reply by Ann Ticopa on June 20, 2011 at 9:31pm "
Yelling" (all caps) isn't very respectful. If you meant to restrict your advice to "show respect" to dealings with powerful multinational corporations, a more accurate description of that behavior would be "sucking up".
Yes the deal between ERI and Shell was made over a year ago. But control wasn't transferred until July 2010, at which point Shell changed the name to East Resources Management (ERM). A lease I was offered by a Long landman in August 2010 was in the name of East Resources Management. Don't know that it was true, but the Long landman said that Shell was contractually obligated to continue to use Long's services for two years.
Permalink Reply by Josie on June 21, 2011 at 7:37pm A lot of the Memorandum of Lease documents coming through Landex are under SWEPT LP and not as much with East Resources Management. SWEPI LP has been the leasing arm of Shell for perhaps 10 years and is based in Dallas Tx. I think.
Permalink Reply by Ann Ticopa on June 21, 2011 at 8:15pm
248 members
19 members
128 members
139 members
373 members
© 2012 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).