Although not to the Rice’s satisfaction, their proxy and director challenges have already impacted the direction of EQT to lower costs and stir up management.
All questions I think all of us have, but as a land owner who has dealt with both Rice and EQT, I have to say that land owner and community relations were better with Rice. They definitely took a more personal interest and were more approachable with their land owners. As far as the bottom line, maximum production and market sales are our most important considerations, no matter who ends up running the company. After 2.5 yrs production under Rice and 1.25 yrs with EQT, on the land owner end, return was better under Rice BUT market conditions have as much to do with that as production rate and marketing. My biggest question would be which leadership has plans to expand on what they started, as opposed to being content with the status quo. We expected additional drilling and production under both entities yet have remained stagnant, whether that is part of Rice's complaint with EQT management or a holdover from Rice. In any case, increased drilling and production at the best market prices for the least investment is advantageous to both land owners and investors so we are anxious to see how this all pans out. Don't think anyone really knows. EQT seems to be much more secretive with their plans, keeping everyone without explicit need out of the loop. That doesn't go over well with land owners, who should be kept informed of expansion, or lack thereof, since they'd have NOTHING without them and have a vested interest in operations. I guess time will tell.
I like Rice better as a Co. to work with as a whole Rice was easy to talk too and didn't seem to mind any questions I had. I would think EQT should be drilling the heck out of the leases to cover the cost of buying out rice. There are many permits in Springhill TWP. Greene Co. PA and no one knows if and when EQT will act on these.So the jury is still out for me.
Curious how drilling out the acreage would cover the cost of the acquisition. The market has shown that the only E&P stocks to climb under the current conditions are those that have curtailed production, entertained buy-backs or increased dividends.
Those who have turned a blind eye to that have continued to plummet.
well as I see if your not selling gas your aren't making any money All the acres in the world don't make money if your not producing or selling any gas. CASH FLOW
My gas got sold in 2017, but I have not been paid for it. All up to date for 2018. Shitty customer relations (EQT) and I make the same tired call several times a month. Well went into production Oct 17. Gulfport\EQT(Rice) well. Gulfport paid and current. I get nothing but runaround from customer relations. Can we say pass the buck? Rooting for the Rice brothers. I think they now see what a fool move they made, but as always rear sight is always 20\20
I agree with the customer relations of EQT.I have been trying to resolve an issue on a well payment for months.I tell the person that answers my call what the problem is,she says she'll make a note and send it up.It can be 2 or 3 weeks before I get a call,and heaven forbid I'm not home.You return the call,get the main switchboard and,once again,they make a note to pass along.Instead of a return call that day or the next,even after I plead that I don't want to be placed on their 10 day(lol) wait list,it can be 2 or 3 more weeks.I bet if you owed them money,they wouldn't piddle around like that.....
In a vacuum that makes sense, but they certainly are selling a lot of gas from their existing wells. Undeveloped acreage doesn't make money, but spending $45-60mm to develop a new pad under current market conditions doesn't either. Across the board, those basic economics have driven down stock prices for companies that have gone with the blindly plug-and-chug approach.
That makes sense however the acreage and existing well pads EQT acquired in the Rice deal aren't being expanded on either. Existing, already producing pads with plenty of room for expansion DO make money however from what I've seen of EQT's operation is continuing business as usual on their own existing pads and ignoring the huge potential in the newly acqired Rice producing pads. Example: I've seen them add lateral after lateral to one pad (upwards of 20) in my area while at least 3 large formerly Rice pads with exponentially more room for expansion sit with no additional drilling. That is wasting assets. I sincerely hope either this Rice Team takeover is successful OR it lights a fire under EQT. As far as customer svc, Rice was the best.
There is a drilling rig now on Mohawk Warrior (former rice and producing. One of the early wells. )
yes I agree with you 100 % There are aprox 41 well permits in Springhill TWP. Greene CO. PA pads in place roads are in so whats the problem I have a lease where it may expire again before its drilled and that's ok by me the bonus seems to be the better deal.2nd marcellus lease up in 3 yrs and the Utica up in 1 yrs so that tells me if they can lease 2 or 3 times just how much is it worth