Greenpeace Founder Says Carbon Dioxide Does Not Cause Golbal Warming - GoMarcellusShale.com2024-03-28T08:15:42Zhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/forum/topics/greenpeace-founder-says-carbon-dioxide-does-not-cause-golbal?commentId=2274639%3AComment%3A751116&feed=yes&xn_auth=noUnfortunately Barry you have…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-10-04:2274639:Comment:7516432016-10-04T15:06:23.201ZRobert J. Smithhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/RobertJSmith
<p>Unfortunately Barry you have a quack here. He hasn't belonged to Greenpeace since the 1970's and left them to make money by supporting the polluters. This guy's ideas have not only been debunked by scientists around the world but also by Greenpeace. Go to the Greenpeace web site to see what they say about this quack. There URL is: …</p>
<p>Unfortunately Barry you have a quack here. He hasn't belonged to Greenpeace since the 1970's and left them to make money by supporting the polluters. This guy's ideas have not only been debunked by scientists around the world but also by Greenpeace. Go to the Greenpeace web site to see what they say about this quack. There URL is: <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/news/greenpeace-statement-on-patric/" target="_blank">http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/news/greenpeace-statement-on-patric/</a></p> Ummm.... I hate to crash the…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-10-04:2274639:Comment:7515112016-10-04T01:28:56.887ZJD Stillwaterhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/JDStillwater
<p>Ummm.... I hate to crash the party, but this guy is far from "wise and well educated." Does he really think climate scientists have not taken his simplistic points into account? This video is propaganda - very little science, selectively presented, and lacking any grasp of the complexities involved. The claim that if we were to stop burning fossil fuels it would kill the trees is so ridiculous as to be unworthy of a response. What does he think kept plants alive before we started burning…</p>
<p>Ummm.... I hate to crash the party, but this guy is far from "wise and well educated." Does he really think climate scientists have not taken his simplistic points into account? This video is propaganda - very little science, selectively presented, and lacking any grasp of the complexities involved. The claim that if we were to stop burning fossil fuels it would kill the trees is so ridiculous as to be unworthy of a response. What does he think kept plants alive before we started burning coal? </p>
<p>It is very difficult to see the truth when your paycheck depends on not seeing it. I'm no enemy of gas development as a transition fuel, but every leased landowner on this forum knows all too well who the bullies and the liars are on this issue, especially if they're leased with Chesapeake.</p>
<p>Let's not bury our heads in the sand for ideological reasons. Look at the science, the real science, and you'll see that we have to cut CO2 emissions if we want to avoid serious problems. No, climate change won't destroy the earth, but it will cost billions upon billions of dollars and quite a few lives. Just ask an insurance company about their take on global warming! </p> Now watch the Ring of Fire. S…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-10-02:2274639:Comment:7515332016-10-02T00:31:18.948ZTim Tarrhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/TimothyTarr
Now watch the Ring of Fire. South end of San Andreas fault (Salton Sea) having Earthquake swarms and today a volcanic eruption in SW Mexico (Colima). Add enough volcanic ash to upper atmosphere with a solar Grand Minimum and this could be a 1000 year event. Just hope it's not a 10,000+ year event.<br />
Watch these dates Oct 16&30 and Nov 14 (especially) and lastly Nov 29.<br />
Shown enough of my tin foil hat for now.
Now watch the Ring of Fire. South end of San Andreas fault (Salton Sea) having Earthquake swarms and today a volcanic eruption in SW Mexico (Colima). Add enough volcanic ash to upper atmosphere with a solar Grand Minimum and this could be a 1000 year event. Just hope it's not a 10,000+ year event.<br />
Watch these dates Oct 16&30 and Nov 14 (especially) and lastly Nov 29.<br />
Shown enough of my tin foil hat for now. "Patrick Moore has a financia…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-10-01:2274639:Comment:7515272016-10-01T19:24:03.447ZGas Boyhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/BobSmith653
<p>"Patrick Moore has a financial incentive to be a climate change skeptic" - Paul heckbert</p>
<p></p>
<p>Likewise, Al Gore has a financial incentive to be a climate change believer. He's practically a Billionaire by pimping his "human caused" climate change baloney.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>"Patrick Moore has a financial incentive to be a climate change skeptic" - Paul heckbert</p>
<p></p>
<p>Likewise, Al Gore has a financial incentive to be a climate change believer. He's practically a Billionaire by pimping his "human caused" climate change baloney.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p> Tim,
The fact that world is i…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-10-01:2274639:Comment:7513762016-10-01T17:09:45.863ZBarry Dhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/BarryDyngel
<p>Tim,</p>
<p>The fact that world is in a cooling cycle is completely ignored by the man made global warming crowd.</p>
<p>Tim,</p>
<p>The fact that world is in a cooling cycle is completely ignored by the man made global warming crowd.</p> Get ready for the excuses. By…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-10-01:2274639:Comment:7513722016-10-01T16:10:27.484ZTim Tarrhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/TimothyTarr
Get ready for the excuses. By 2022 Arctic ice will be above 1981-2010 average. Currently back to 2007 levels. Low was in 2012.<br />
<br />
Bet they change the dates for calculating average ice levels. Using 1979-2000 instead of 1981-2010. That won't work either. By 2022 probably highest ice level in 100+ years.<br />
<br />
Better book ahead for the Thames Frost Fair. For those that prefer domestic travel book New Orleans to see ice in the Gulf from Mississippi River.
Get ready for the excuses. By 2022 Arctic ice will be above 1981-2010 average. Currently back to 2007 levels. Low was in 2012.<br />
<br />
Bet they change the dates for calculating average ice levels. Using 1979-2000 instead of 1981-2010. That won't work either. By 2022 probably highest ice level in 100+ years.<br />
<br />
Better book ahead for the Thames Frost Fair. For those that prefer domestic travel book New Orleans to see ice in the Gulf from Mississippi River. Paul,
It took me this long to…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-10-01:2274639:Comment:7513652016-10-01T11:51:06.830ZBarry Dhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/BarryDyngel
<p>Paul,</p>
<p>It took me this long to reply again, I was laughing for so long.</p>
<p>You cite a comic as a source to support your position?</p>
<p>That is priceless!</p>
<p>Paul,</p>
<p>It took me this long to reply again, I was laughing for so long.</p>
<p>You cite a comic as a source to support your position?</p>
<p>That is priceless!</p> Paul,
You didn't even watch t…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-09-28:2274639:Comment:7511582016-09-28T00:26:40.694ZBarry Dhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/BarryDyngel
<p>Paul,</p>
<p>You didn't even watch the video. Instead of discussing the content you imdeiately attack the person. Typical whacko environmental leftist.</p>
<p>That's right, the world was colder. BTW who was alive to take the temp and record it.</p>
<p>But I digress, the point is that the earth warmed long before the use of carbon fuels.</p>
<p>So how did that occur? Simple, the earth is continuously in a cooling and warming cycle.</p>
<p>We are actually in a cooling cycle right now, not a…</p>
<p>Paul,</p>
<p>You didn't even watch the video. Instead of discussing the content you imdeiately attack the person. Typical whacko environmental leftist.</p>
<p>That's right, the world was colder. BTW who was alive to take the temp and record it.</p>
<p>But I digress, the point is that the earth warmed long before the use of carbon fuels.</p>
<p>So how did that occur? Simple, the earth is continuously in a cooling and warming cycle.</p>
<p>We are actually in a cooling cycle right now, not a warming cycle.</p>
<p>The fact is that there is no proof of man made global warming. I state again, no proof.</p>
<p>The info whackos such as Paul use is all theory based on computer models. Computer models are only as reliable as the data input into the programs. Garbage in, garbage out.</p>
<p>The whackos put in data that supports their theory, leaving out anything that disputing the theories, that's the garbage in.</p>
<p>Paul, once again, there is no proof that man causes global warming. Nor is there proof that carbon dioxide plays a part.</p>
<p>You are fear monger continually spewing misinformation in order to create fear.</p>
<p>Shame on you.</p>
<p>BTW, sea levels are declining. All those islands that you nut jobs claim will be submerged are actually expanding because sea levels have dropped.</p>
<p>You do not have your head in the sand. Instead you have it firmly implanted in your butt.</p> Patrick Moore wasn’t “THE fou…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-09-28:2274639:Comment:7509022016-09-28T00:07:52.829ZPaul Heckberthttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/PaulHeckbert
<p class="p1">Patrick Moore wasn’t “THE founder” of Greenpeace, he was one of several.</p>
<p class="p2">“The current Greenpeace web site lists the founders of The Don't Make a Wave Committee as Dorothy and Irving Stowe, Marie and Jim Bohlen, Ben and Dorothy Metcalfe, and Robert Hunter. According to both Patrick Moore and an interview with Dorothy Stowe, Dorothy Metcalfe, Jim Bohlen and Robert Hunter, the founders of The Don't Make a Wave Committee were Paul Cote, Irving and Dorothy Stowe and…</p>
<p class="p1">Patrick Moore wasn’t “THE founder” of Greenpeace, he was one of several.</p>
<p class="p2">“The current Greenpeace web site lists the founders of The Don't Make a Wave Committee as Dorothy and Irving Stowe, Marie and Jim Bohlen, Ben and Dorothy Metcalfe, and Robert Hunter. According to both Patrick Moore and an interview with Dorothy Stowe, Dorothy Metcalfe, Jim Bohlen and Robert Hunter, the founders of The Don't Make a Wave Committee were Paul Cote, Irving and Dorothy Stowe and Jim and Marie Bohlen.”</p>
<p class="p1"><a rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenpeace">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenpeace</a></p>
<p class="p2"></p>
<p class="p1">Patrick Moore has a financial incentive to be a climate change skeptic.</p>
<p class="p1">“Moore has earned his living since the early 1990s primarily by consulting for, and publicly speaking for a wide variety of corporations and lobby groups such as the Nuclear Energy Institute."</p>
<p class="p2"></p>
<p class="p1">Patrick Moore’s recent statements are unscientific.</p>
<p class="p1">"During March 2015 in an interview … Moore was asked about the safety of the herbicide glyphosate. Moore told Paul Moreira that one "could drink a whole quart of it" without any harm. When Moore was challenged to drink a glass of the weedkiller, he refused, and ended the interview. The interview came shortly after the release of a World Health Organization (WHO) report adding glyphosate to a list of probable carcinogens.”</p>
<p class="p1"><a rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Moore_(environmentalist)">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Moore_(environmentalist)</a></p>
<p class="p2"></p>
<p class="p1"><strong>People that bury their heads in the sand can ignore global warming for now, but do that too long, and rising sea level may inundate them.</strong></p>
<p class="p2"></p>
<p class="p1">A fraction of an Xkcd comic below. Click this <a rel="nofollow" href="http://xkcd.com/1732/">http://xkcd.com/1732/</a> for more</p>
<p class="p1"><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/35535337?profile=original" target="_self"><img src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/35535337?profile=original" width="590" class="align-full"/></a></p> Excellent!
Finally some truth…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-09-27:2274639:Comment:7509662016-09-27T18:22:40.524ZKeith A Williamshttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/KeithAWilliams
<p>Excellent!</p>
<p>Finally some truth!</p>
<p>I really think some people would not be satisfied unless we all lived in huts and it was an ice age again. </p>
<p>Excellent!</p>
<p>Finally some truth!</p>
<p>I really think some people would not be satisfied unless we all lived in huts and it was an ice age again. </p>