Ohio Supreme Court Hands Down Slip Decision In Favor of 700 Landowners - GoMarcellusShale.com2024-03-28T12:49:58Zhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/forum/topics/ohio-supreme-court-hands-down-slip-decision-in-favor-of-700?commentId=2274639%3AComment%3A714454&feed=yes&xn_auth=noFinally it all reads to me li…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-02-02:2274639:Comment:7160172016-02-02T15:55:38.797ZJoseph-Ohiohttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/JosephEPowell
Finally it all reads to me like the lessors attempting to escape Utica Sub-Standard Leases and the Court ruling against them.<br />
<br />
Please correct me if I'm mistaken.<br />
<br />
Just my read on it.<br />
<br />
Good Luck to all of us.
Finally it all reads to me like the lessors attempting to escape Utica Sub-Standard Leases and the Court ruling against them.<br />
<br />
Please correct me if I'm mistaken.<br />
<br />
Just my read on it.<br />
<br />
Good Luck to all of us. jerry,
He did dissent with re…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-01-29:2274639:Comment:7154122016-01-29T20:53:42.560ZBarry Dhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/BarryDyngel
<p>jerry,</p>
<p>He did dissent with regard to the Clagus issue.</p>
<p>He agreed with the issue of the leases being valid.</p>
<p>jerry,</p>
<p>He did dissent with regard to the Clagus issue.</p>
<p>He agreed with the issue of the leases being valid.</p> This might help clear things…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-01-29:2274639:Comment:7155282016-01-29T20:03:36.512ZWranglerRouserhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/WranglerRouser
<p>This might help clear things up:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kwgd.com/hupp-claugus?utm_source=Uitca+Journa+%2366&utm_campaign=Oil+and+Gas+Newsletter+54&utm_medium=email" target="_blank">The Ohio Supreme Court Finds Oil and Gas Leases Are Not Void As Against Public Policy</a></p>
<p>This might help clear things up:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kwgd.com/hupp-claugus?utm_source=Uitca+Journa+%2366&utm_campaign=Oil+and+Gas+Newsletter+54&utm_medium=email" target="_blank">The Ohio Supreme Court Finds Oil and Gas Leases Are Not Void As Against Public Policy</a></p> I thought it said that he dis…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-01-29:2274639:Comment:7155192016-01-29T15:47:25.156Zjerry lee nicholshttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/jerryleenichols
<p>I thought it said that he dissented as per Clagus,I guess that I was wrong, One thing though I am glad that I told ole Becky that I wasn't interested years back.</p>
<p>I thought it said that he dissented as per Clagus,I guess that I was wrong, One thing though I am glad that I told ole Becky that I wasn't interested years back.</p> jerry,
Justice Pfieffer agree…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-01-29:2274639:Comment:7153942016-01-29T03:39:43.382ZBarry Dhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/BarryDyngel
<p>jerry,</p>
<p>Justice Pfieffer agreed with the majority that the Beck Leases were valid.</p>
<p>That was pro citizen?</p>
<p></p>
<p>jerry,</p>
<p>Justice Pfieffer agreed with the majority that the Beck Leases were valid.</p>
<p>That was pro citizen?</p>
<p></p> What it still means is that t…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-01-29:2274639:Comment:7153882016-01-29T02:39:21.898Zjerry lee nicholshttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/jerryleenichols
<p>What it still means is that the court has 6 business republicans and Paul Pfieffer. They managed a few years back to take away their Ballot party affliation so that people would not see how anti citizen that they are.</p>
<p>What it still means is that the court has 6 business republicans and Paul Pfieffer. They managed a few years back to take away their Ballot party affliation so that people would not see how anti citizen that they are.</p> Thanks Barry D.tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-01-29:2274639:Comment:7154552016-01-29T02:20:57.852ZJoseph-Ohiohttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/JosephEPowell
Thanks Barry D.
Thanks Barry D. Oh well, so much for trying t…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-01-29:2274639:Comment:7155142016-01-29T02:20:05.326ZJoseph-Ohiohttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/JosephEPowell
Oh well, so much for trying to figure that part of it out (lol - as I now know that I can't).<br />
<br />
Only importance attached to any denied / expired 'Tolling' that I can see would be how it affects the 'Delay Rental' amounts due the lessors involved.<br />
<br />
Good luck to all.
Oh well, so much for trying to figure that part of it out (lol - as I now know that I can't).<br />
<br />
Only importance attached to any denied / expired 'Tolling' that I can see would be how it affects the 'Delay Rental' amounts due the lessors involved.<br />
<br />
Good luck to all. Joseph,
The dissent means not…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-01-29:2274639:Comment:7154542016-01-29T01:13:11.921ZBarry Dhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/BarryDyngel
<p>Joseph,</p>
<p>The dissent means nothing to this case.</p>
<p>However, it may be cited in future court cases as support for an opinion or an argument.</p>
<p>Joseph,</p>
<p>The dissent means nothing to this case.</p>
<p>However, it may be cited in future court cases as support for an opinion or an argument.</p> Joseph,
No,
The Supreme Court…tag:gomarcellusshale.com,2016-01-29:2274639:Comment:7154522016-01-29T01:10:57.083ZBarry Dhttps://gomarcellusshale.com/profile/BarryDyngel
<p>Joseph,</p>
<p>No,</p>
<p>The Supreme Court denied a request for a new tolling order.</p>
<p>I believe the original tolling order expired with the decision by the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>This is just an arm chair attorney opinion.</p>
<p>My apologies to those who don't appreciate the opinions of arm chair attorneys. 1st amendment, free speech and all that.</p>
<p>Joseph,</p>
<p>No,</p>
<p>The Supreme Court denied a request for a new tolling order.</p>
<p>I believe the original tolling order expired with the decision by the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>This is just an arm chair attorney opinion.</p>
<p>My apologies to those who don't appreciate the opinions of arm chair attorneys. 1st amendment, free speech and all that.</p>