Neo - Fascism ? ?  Or Degrees of Socialism / Communism ? ?

Pick your poison.

Right here in the Land of the Free / Home of the Brave ? ?

Whaaaaaaaat ? ?

Still can't find a candidate's bus to hop on myself.

JMHOs

Views: 2473

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

THE FACT IS THAT IF HILLARY CLINTON  wins the general election our country could rapidly change to total socialism or even communism, especially if our Congress keeps supporting whatever the Democrats want !!!!!

I don't like the picture you paint.

Justice / including the Federal  Justice Department is supposed to be blind to partisanship but thinking everyone knows what happens in the final analysis.

There's no way for that to happen, Joseph, unless the current justices all retire/die. Because the ones who will remain are EXTREMELY liberal and very partisan. 

AGREE !

JOSEPH, if Clinton or Sanders win the election, kiss your mineral rights GOODBY !!!

JO, IMHO if a Rep. is elected we will get middle of the road SCJ, representing everyone, if a Dem. is elected we will get lopsided LIBERALS representing only the one side not everyone. That has been the current trend.

We'll therein lies the rub doesn't it ?

Conservative are concerned that it will all be too Liberal / Left Heavy.

While Liberals are concerned that it will all be too Conservative / Right Heavy.

A never ending battle of the extremes.

Supreme Court Justices nominated by the partisan POTUS.

How to fix that ?

An equal number of Justices hailing from each persuasion but sworn to set aside partisanship perhaps ?

You know, the old 'cut the baby in half' solution so to speak - could that work ?

Joseph,

With all due respect, you need to re-read the Constitution. There is no provision for a court based upon political beliefs. Further, there are only nine justices, whereas there are hundreds of political beliefs.

Supreme Court Justices are to apply the laws as written not interpret them. Unfortunately it has become common practice for justices to insert their personal beliefs into their decisions.

Bottom line, Trump will appoint a far better candidate to the court than HilLIARY. Even if the candidate he proposes isn't one we might want.

In the end I do not believe that Trump is not very focused on the Supreme Court nominee. Therefore, he may be persuaded to nominate a strict Constitutionalist.

Only time will tell. But we cannot give the power to nominate a Supreme Court justice to HilLIARy.

P.S. Conservative Presidents have nominated justices that have performed miserably, i.e. John Roberts, Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy to name a couple.

TOTALLY AGREE !!!  THIS IS THE IMPORTANT REASON TO ELECT DONALD TRUMP !!!  ELECTING EITHER COMMUNIST-COMMUNIST LIBERAL DEMOCRAT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WOULD HAVE DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES FOREVER !!!!!

No Authoritarian Communists allowed.

No Authoritarian Socialists allowed.

No Authoritarian Fascists / Neo-Fascists allowed.

The only problem with being a 1%'er is that after the 99%'ers have realized their demise there is nobody left to do all the dirty work involved pertaining to any country - actually there would not be a country at all !

Barry D,

Excerpted from what you've written above :

'There is no provision for a court based upon political beliefs.'

And likewise, with all due respect sir, it appears to me (and I think many others) that it's working out to be exactly that (however) since nominees are appointed by the partisan POTUS

THE HARSH TRUTH IS THAT DEMOCRATS FIGHT TO THE END FOR THEIR LIBERAL CHOICES, AND IF WE CONSERVATIVES JOIN THEM, WHERE IS OUR VOICE ?????  WE WILL HAVE NONE AND WILL BE SUBJECT TO WHATEVER THE LIBERALS DECIDE TO DO:  TAKE OUR GUNS, TAKE OUR PROPERTY AND MINERALS, TAKE ALL OUR MONEY TO REDISTRIBUTE IT FURTHER TO THE ILLEGALS, NON-WORKERS, AND OTHER COUNTRIES !!!

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service