Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Stan G on January 24, 2013 at 8:37am

3.49 in Litchfield.

The deductions were also a lot lower. 34% last month, 26 % in Nov

Permalink Reply by melissa humphrey on January 27, 2013 at 6:45pm

stan- fwiw, deductions are generally a per MCF charge, thus as gas rises ,  etc.

Permalink Reply by Dave on January 25, 2013 at 5:31am

I heard the Epler weli on 220 was paying 400 a acre per month

Permalink Reply by LW on January 25, 2013 at 1:08pm

Wow! Close to there, but we realized about $90 an acre per month.  12.5 % royalty.  Can't wait to see the production for the last half 2012.    I think they should be updated 2/15, but will they? 

Permalink Reply by melissa humphrey on January 27, 2013 at 6:46pm

400 with 3.50 would be dynamite. implies huge production.

that might be 20% no deductions ?

Permalink Reply by Moldyoak on January 28, 2013 at 10:31pm

Well I'll confirm that CHK paid on $3.52 sale price for November, well is on Terry/Albany line.  Can't speak to Anadarko, Stat or Mitsui yet.

Permalink Reply by Sherre Boyanowski on January 28, 2013 at 11:33pm

$3.59 and $3.60 in 2 of my units by CHK for November. Waiting for Anadarko, Stat and Mitsui. Did receive 1099 from Anadarko. Wyoming Co.

Permalink Reply by melissa humphrey on January 31, 2013 at 8:16pm

Anadrako SE Brad sampling of wells, paid on 3.45 to 3.53

At least inline w Chesapeake.

Permalink Reply by melissa humphrey on January 31, 2013 at 8:17pm

thx for the participation   --- helps feeling less alone!!

Permalink Reply by melissa humphrey on January 31, 2013 at 8:24pm

no idea why but have seen some NW Wyoming data and

oft seems to earn a permium over SE Bradford.

It can even depend on what feeder line connection to the TGP you are on,

congrats. anything helps.

 

NW Wyoming leads PA in prod / well. It is generally deeper which means more pressure which implies more GIP (gas in place). That holds true going south, until you hit the trip point where thermal maturity rises so high, the in place material becomes CO2.

Ie the Carizzo Shields well, so disappointing to folks W mid Cnty and South. This is highly emotional, especially after such high successes in some areas, then to find one may just miss the gold.  Rough rough.

 

Permalink Reply by SD on February 1, 2013 at 6:48am

Melissa,

 

Do you have information on individual wells?   I am trying to help a relative.  Is there a problem with the Alberta Well in SE Bradford county?   It seems the production is much lower than neighboring wells.  

 

Permalink Reply by melissa humphrey on February 4, 2013 at 5:42pm

SD- I have nothing specific on the Alberta.. I only get a few #s now and then. If you have math skills you can work the data backwards and come up with per well monthly output. Get neighbors to do the same and share. I did see 2 wells S of Alberta 3-4 miles, they were light vs the area average still good. ~ 180,000 mcf / month , or  5 Mmcf / day. Still nice.

There are a few extra light wells around, could be less than ideal bit steering that didn't enter at the ideal point or could be weaker geology. Hopefully it is the former, as the wells in the future will be good.

And any well could be subject to scare capacity in gathering, let alone interstate.

 

Sorry I do not no more.

 

There have been significant arguments re unit size, I WANT to be in a big UNIT for diversity. I am informed there are two wells on the same site which started out equal, Aug 2011, but now the weaker is 2/3rds less than the stronger. If that were a North/ South unit split, half would be wounded, being a single unit, it is averaged.

Of course you all probably are SURE you would be in the GOOD unit. Ha.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page