Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Ann Ticopa on April 29, 2016 at 11:31am

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION
Projects Approved for Consumptive Uses of Water
April 30, 2016

" 7. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Cole 495, ABR-201102016.R1, Richmond Township, Tioga County, PA; Consumptive Use of Up to 4.0000 mgd; Approval Date: March 9, 2016.

 8. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Boroch 477, ABR-201102018.R1, Charleston Township, Tioga County, PA

 19. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Kuhl 529, ABR-201102014.R1, Richmond Township, Tioga County, PA; Consumptive Use of Up to 4.0000 mgd; Approval Date: March 11, 2016.

 20. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: Stanley 1106, ABR-201102015.R1, Osceola Township, Tioga County, PA; Consumptive Use of Up to 4.0000 mgd; Approval Date: March 11, 2016.

 21. SWEPI, LP, Pad ID: MY TB INV LLC 891, ABR-201102010.R1, Deerfield Township, Tioga County, PA; Consumptive Use of Up to 4.0000 mgd; Approval Date: March 11, 2016."

http://www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol46/46-18/776.html

Permalink Reply by Jack Young on May 2, 2016 at 12:51pm

Lucky they sold their local assets to Shell, or we'd all be wondering what was coming next. There's a real advantage being leased by one of the truly big operators.

Permalink Reply by David on May 2, 2016 at 1:51pm

Thanks for the post.  I was taken aback by reading that Ultra failed to pay transport fees.  Showing my ignorance of landowner deductions I though compression an transport costs were 'a guess' pass thru.  And reason for months behind actual reimbursement to get all the fees in line.  Having a well that at one point was managed by both Ultra and Shell. I kinda recall (memory is failing) that Ultra had higher fees on compression transport.  I just thought at time that Ultra was smaller company and had to pay more since smaller volume.  So my concern is there any clarity on fees that well mangers have to the land owner? 

Permalink Reply by Gringo on May 4, 2016 at 3:23pm

Those are just major faults, there are countless numbers of faults in the county. Some are detrimental and many are none issues. Swepi has it all detailed on their mapping system, and no it is not for public view. 

Permalink Reply by Ann Ticopa on June 2, 2016 at 11:50am

"Kinder Morgan Projects Receive FERC Authorizations
Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE: KMI) today announced that subsidiaries Elba Liquefaction Company, L.L.C. (ELC) and Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. (SLNG), have received authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the Elba Liquefaction Project. The approximate $2 billion project will be constructed and operated at the existing Elba Island LNG Terminal near Savannah, Georgia. As previously announced, the first of 10 liquefaction units is expected to be placed in service in the second quarter of 2018, with the remaining nine units coming online before the end of 2018. This project is supported by a 20-year contract with Shell. ..."

http://ir.kindermorgan.com/press-release/kindermorgan/kinder-morgan...

Permalink Reply by Ann Ticopa on June 7, 2016 at 12:07pm

"Capital markets day 2016: Re-shaping Shell to create a world class investment case
... Go ahead given for new Pennsylvania chemicals development. Chemicals and deep water are now Shell’s growth priorities ..."
http://www.shell.com/media/news-and-media-releases/2016/capital-mar...

Permalink Reply by Ann Ticopa on June 9, 2016 at 7:42pm

What MDN says about MCOR:
"Penn State has given us some of the best research (and personnel) we’ve ever seen when it comes to the Marcellus Shale. In particular we’re thinking of Penn State’s Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research (MCOR). Great people. Super research."

What MDN says about Marcellus by Design:
"Yes, it’s as stupid as it sounds. The aim is, of course, to not install a pipeline at all. It’s an elaborate anti-drilling hoax cloaked to look like something it is not. "

Yet, on their home page, MCOR features a Marcellus by Design News Release summarizing the project and listing their scheduled workshops.  

Permalink Reply by Ann Ticopa on June 9, 2016 at 8:39pm

The inconsistency.

Permalink Reply by Frank Walker on June 12, 2016 at 12:29pm

The very same jackasses, who are so incredibly persnickety about pipeline placement, would be willing and eager to build 400 foot tall wind turbine raptor and bird slaughtering machines practically anywhere.  WABOA!!!!!!!!!!!!  Truly, they are insane. 

Permalink Reply by Brian Day on July 10, 2016 at 5:43pm

I have posted a discussion on the general discussion forum of this site that was meant for the Tioga portion only.  I commented to that effect, but the discussion has not been moved to here.  If you are interested it is on the General discussion page.

Permalink Reply by Brian Day on July 10, 2016 at 8:59pm

Go to the top of this page and hit the GoMarcellusShale at the very top.  My post is the fifth one down at this time.

Permalink Reply by N Bohl on July 28, 2016 at 10:04pm

 

The new State map is really helpful looking at Tioga County now. I had been paying attention to permitting the last year and it seemed to me like a lot of townships were involved. So I looked at the most recent production results that have been filed to see what townships were doing what. I was a little surprised to see the following --

Of the top 25 producing wells in Tioga County for May 2016 Osceola Township had the greatest producer and 18 of the top 25 wells are SWEPI wells. 11 of Tioga Counties 29 Townships are in the top 25.

2 in Osceola , 5 in Richmond, 1 in Shippen, 2 in Delmar, 5 in Sullivan, 2 in Middlebury, 1 in Charleston, 1 in Hamilton, 2 in Duncan, 3 in Blossburg and 1 in Bloss.

I only post this because the results of the new wells looked promising I thought. I also noticed that you can begin to see what the depletion rate might be with some of these Utica wells and you can see this quite easily using the new mapping system.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 71
• 72
• 73
• 74
• 75
• …
• 157
• Next ›
• Page