matthew rouse's Discussions (11)

Search Forum

View

Discussions Replied To (8) Replies Latest Activity

"OR maybe there are people out there that bought their land long ago and told the law…"

matthew rouse replied Sep 19, 2016 to Walker v Nau: supreme court case decided in favor of mineral rights owners!!!

 52 Sep 29, 2016
Reply by Scott72

"True but that is bad for the overall development"

matthew rouse replied Sep 16, 2016 to Ohio supreme court

 19 Sep 16, 2016
Reply by matthew rouse

"and maybe some bad new too if those happy landowners are next to a tract of minerals…"

matthew rouse replied Sep 16, 2016 to Ohio supreme court

 19 Sep 16, 2016
Reply by matthew rouse

"Will the state of OHIO now collect back taxes on those mineral rights that a lot of…"

matthew rouse replied Sep 16, 2016 to Ohio supreme court

 19 Sep 16, 2016
Reply by matthew rouse

"and a lot of unhappy landowners"

matthew rouse replied Sep 16, 2016 to Ohio supreme court

 19 Sep 16, 2016
Reply by matthew rouse

"That probably did not happen much as the companies leasing the mineral sare usually…"

matthew rouse replied Sep 16, 2016 to Walker v Nau: supreme court case decided in favor of mineral rights owners!!!

 52 Sep 29, 2016
Reply by Scott72

"gross-but from my experience they all want the market enhancement clause in the leas…"

matthew rouse replied Jul 19, 2016 to New Eclipse Lease

 34 Nov 21, 2017
Reply by David Allen Lilly

"I would feel great about an 8k per acre bonus. That was not an option they talked ab…"

matthew rouse replied Jul 19, 2016 to New Eclipse Lease

 34 Nov 21, 2017
Reply by David Allen Lilly

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service