1989 DMA

1989 DMA IS NOT DEAD YET.   Anyone interested in moving forward please friend request me to be discussed further.

Views: 463

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Barry D on October 8, 2016 at 8:56am

bb,

Why keep this discussion secret? It will affect many people.

Having read the decision of the Ohio Supreme Court I don't see how your claim is accurate.

Please explain so we can have an open discussion here on one of the best formats ever.

Permalink Reply by Loretta o'Leary on October 8, 2016 at 12:50pm
Agree. BB needs to accept the fact that her side lost. I hope she is not spending her money on her lost cause. Maybe she has an attorney who is using her to line line his pocketbook. Hope not.
Permalink Reply by Susan Tribett on October 10, 2016 at 3:56am

Count me in 100% bessieblues!!!

Permalink Reply by Laura on October 10, 2016 at 5:38am
What's this thread about? I'm confused. Lol

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service