2 things heard no Utica drilling in Tuscarawas county ? Sunoco Transfer line ?
Has anyone heard that there would be no drilling of the Utica shale in Tuscarawas county and leasing has stopped ? heard this second hand . Also ! been contacted by Sunoco for a transfer line that they want to put in from Midstream in Scio to the state of Delaware , we have met them ; has anyone else been contacted or have had meeting with their Landmens .
Views: 3270
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Charles Randolph on
-
Are you sure they said the "state of Delaware" and not "on the Delaware" ? Sunoco Logistics pipelines already go to the large and expanding facility at Marcus Hook on the Delaware River, but that's in Pennsylvania.
-
-
no, they told us the line will go through Ohio , WVa , PA and state of Delaware assuming there they would export the gases on the coast line for transporting ,
-
-
all that they said ,,,its the Sunoco pipe line for transferring ...right now they are surveying the land before making any decisions as to where this pipe line going through land owners property . Sounds like a straight line to the state of Delaware . Right now they are offering $15.00 per lineal foot , Not enough to come across my land .
-
Permalink Reply by TM on -
According to Sunoco, the Mariner East 2 project calls for development of a pipeline from Scio, OH, to a terminal in Marcus Hook, PA on the Delaware River south of Philadelphia, operated by subsidiary Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals LP. The pipeline, which will transport ethane, propane and butane, is expected to be in service by early 2016
According to a map of the Mariner East 2 project, the pipeline would originate at Utica East Ohio Midstream LLC's (UEO) fractionation facility in Scio and service MarkWest Energy Partners LLC’s fractionator at Hopedale, OH. The project would also be connected, through third-party pipelines, to Williams' fractionator in Moundsville, WV, and Blue Racer Midstream LLC's fractionator in Natrium, WV
http://www.naturalgasintel.com/articles/96631-sunoco-launches-open-...
-
-
That's what I suspected. Thank you TM for supplying us with FACTS rather than some kind of gobbledygook suspicions with mixed-up names of incorrect states and similar wrongful geographic locations, EVEN WHEN QUESTIONED ABOUT SUCH THINGS !! That's one of my pet peeves about people on this site... how so many of them make incorrect pronouncements and label them as factual. Then when they are questioned about such things, so many folks seldom seem to admit their mistakes, and instead try to either ignore their earlier mis-statements or choose to attempt to minimize them....(As described here) Be it professionally or elsewhere, deftly covering up, spinning or minimizing one’s mistakes can be the difference between dining on steak at the top or digging around the dumpster for discarded cat food at the bottom. Any modern survival guide absolutely must have a chapter on this invaluable skill. (IMHO, such people should be dining in the dumpster !!) Thanks for your useful and factual input TM !!!
-
-
That's look good ...I will see this attorney in church tomorrow will ask him about this since he is handling lease's .
-
Permalink Reply by JohnL on
-
Looks like KinderMorgan has plans for a Tuscarawas County processing plant.
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=119776&p=irol-newsA...
jl
-
-
My friend a attorney told me yesterday at church , a lot of companies has pull out of Tuscarawas for the time being .Few of his clients offers were pull off of the table, he said there is a small group in the court house pulling deeds , But no one seem to know who they might be , as they are not releasing any information on their self. Also in Jewett, plans are for 7 separation stations for the separating of gases were as Midstream in Scio as 3 of them ( don't know the name of these separations stations that looks like huge tanker from outer space )..We have been told dirt may be moved possibly in January for this transloading facility . I will be meeting with pipeline people this afternoon to renew my one year contract with them .... I have a agreement year to year will not accept anything beyond that . Any other news from others out there , please post it .
-
-
The rumor is that CNX is out due to a number of factors, including the fact that they have some very good acreage on legacy coal mines where they are both the operator and the mineral owner, so their NRI is 100% or close to it. I think it's early to make a call on Tusc and more results need to be generated before anyone can say one way or the other.
-
Permalink Reply by TM on
-
I have heard CNX was considering doing a sale of their scattered acreage. Not sure which counties this would be in though.
-
-
EV Energy Partners attended the 12th annual Wells Fargo Energy Symposium.
EVEP is very involved in the Utica shale. It owns significant acreage, is a drilling partner, is invested in midstream and is leading the push to find recoverable Utica oil.
It is also seeking to sell off a portion of its Utica holdings.
It has a lot of Utica shale upside, company officials said.
Here are some of the highlights from president and CEO Mark Houser’s 27-minute presentation.
1. The midstream bottlenecks in Ohio’s Utica shale are disappearing, he said.
More than $12 billion of pipelines and processing plants have been constructed in eastern Ohio, he said.
That is a number that is being repeatedly used by the energy industry in Ohio.
He said the Utica East Ohio processing plant at Kensington added its second train or unit last week. Two more units are planned at the plant in southern Columbiana County.
The new unit was being filled up on Wednesday and processing will begin soon, Houser said.
2. EVEP, one of the EnerVest family of companies, expects to drill 10 to 15 wells with five to seven different partners outside of its existing joint venture in 2014 in the Utica shale, he said.
He said that two to four of those wells would be in what’s called the volatile oil window with less mature oil.
The company has said it intends to search for the volatile oil with unnamed partners in Stark and Tuscarawas counties.
Very few wells, perhaps 10, have been drilled in the Utica’s volatile oil window, Houser said.
That would be done to demonstrate the productivity of the volatile oil window.
The volatile oil window lies west of the wet gas window where most of the Ohio drilling has occurred in Carroll, Harrison, Belmont, Guernsey, Noble and Washington counties.
There is a lot of oil in the Utica rock, but getting it out may be difficult, Houser said.
3. The company is actively involved in a 10-county JV with Chesapeake Energy and the French energy company Total. That venture is expected to drill 160 wells next year.
Compression constraints on the JV wells should be mostly relaxed by summer 2014, he said.
The JV intends to have 540 wells by the end of 2014.
The overall plan calls for 4,600 wells in the 10 counties over 18 years.
EVEP has about 41,000 acres in the wet gas window in Ohio and another 9,000 acres in western Pennsylvania.
It also has 79,000 acres in the volatile oil window: 78,000 in Ohio and 1,000 in Pennsylvania.
It also has another 44,000 in the two states in the dry gas window.
That is a total working interest acreage of 173,000 acres.
It also owns an overriding royalty interest on 880,000 Utica acres.
4. Houser said his company participated on a non-opposition basis with Pittsburgh-based EQT on two wells in the Utica shale.
The wells were initially producing 500 barrels per day, but that later flattened to 80 to 100 barrels per day, he said.
He called those two of the best oil wells his company had seen in the Utica.
Its own oil wells in the UTica had flattened to about 30 barrels per day, so the EQT results were encouraging, he said.
He offered little other information on that joint effort.
EQT has drilled three wells in the Utica in Ohio’s Guernsey County.
It intends to drill eight Utica wells in Ohio in 2013 at a cost of $40 million.
EQT, in its third quarter 2013 report, said the production results from those Utica wells were “not eye-popping.” But officials said they were encouraged by the initial results.
That assessment came from spokesman Mark Porges.
The three wells were producing 42 percent oil, 28 percent natural gas liquids and 30 percent natural gas.
The wells are producing the revenue equivalent of natural gas wells with IPs of nearly 9 million cubic feet per day, he said.
The wells cost about $8.5 million each, although officials hope to reduce that by $2 million per well. The average lateral length was 5,800 feet.
Those three Utica wells are out-producing the company’s first Marcellus wells, said spokesman Steven Schlotterbeck.
The company has 14,000 net acres in the Utica shale.
EQT is more active in the Marcellus shale in Pennsylvania. It earmarked $820 million to drill 153 Marcellus wells in 2013
5. EVEP is heavily invested in the Barnett shale in north Texas. It is also interested in shale development in the Austin Chalk in Texas. It is also interested in shale in Michigan and New Mexico.
6. The company is still actively marketing its wet gas acres in the Utica shale.
It is likely that a deal or deals will be announced in 2014, he said.
7. A new de-ethanizer is being added at the Harrison Hub near Cadiz and should begin to remove ethane from the natural gas by Jan. 1, Houser said.
That will result in natural gas better able to be shipped via pipelines and an ethane product that can be separated, sold and shipped.
8. The easing of Utica bottlenecks in 2014 should allow Chesapeake Energy to go into full production for the first time, Houser said.
That should help experts clarify production curves and technical understanding of the Utica shale in its northern counties: Carroll, Columbiana, Mahoning and Trumbull counties, he said
Top Content
Latest Activity
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
