It has always amazed me that one of the criticisms from the anti shale left is that there isn't as much development as was promised. It amazed me because these folks should have known this criticism was going to come back and bite them in the rear end ? After all, this type of development takes time (years). Just more proof of the desparation of these folks.

Here is an article for your edification and reading pleasure. It is about another major development due to the Marcellus and Utica.

http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/09/02/4115878/duke-energy-and-part...

Views: 476

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Not all critics of slow development are representatives of the 'anti shale left'.

Take a look at me for instance; I'm as pro-development / pro-shale development / pro-drilling as they come but I am also critical of the slow pace.

Joseph,

Point well taken.

I guess what I meant was that the anti shale left means that the industry is lying when it states that shale development will lead to a general economic development "boom". Booms take time to develop and may go unnoticed.

I agree with you that certain areas seem to have been left behind in the development of shale resources. But I think the time will come.

" Booms take time to develop and may go unnoticed."

Boom - from Webster's

: to make a deep and loud sound

: to say (something) in a deep and loud voice

of a business or industry : to grow or expand suddenly


For most deep sensory impairment is present to not notice a "Boom"



RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service