I will try to keep this as short as possible. Situation Family member owns 197 acres Minerals and surface. Leases mineral rights on 197 acres. Then sells two 53 acre tracts off the surface, with no mention of the lease or giving mineral rights to the new surface owner in either of the deeds. Without mentioning the mineral rights lease how is this perceived. Did he loose the leases and mineral rights on the land he sold or does the lease supersede the sale. Any help would be appreciated      

Views: 360

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Thank you good info. Lease was signed in 1908.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service