Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Steven A Joliat on September 28, 2012 at 3:56pm

I attended the AAPG conference in Cleveland earlier this week.  Ohio survey staff members indicated it will be released soon, it is currently being reviewed by the political overlords, (my opinion.)   As a geologist, I find political review of a scientific document to be generally undesirable as it tends to muddy the issue.

Permalink Reply by 0i7okn54zwbdo on September 28, 2012 at 4:17pm

"As a geologist, I find political review of a scientific document to be generally undesirable as it tends to muddy the issue."

Steven, as a thinking person in general I find political review of basically anything to be generally undesirable, but that's just me.

Permalink Reply by Steven A Joliat on September 28, 2012 at 4:35pm

Quite true.  I also agree with the general case.

Permalink Reply by BrianH on October 3, 2012 at 6:08pm

They must be drawing straws to see who publishes the map.

Permalink Reply by BrianH on October 3, 2012 at 8:39pm

The newest maps ans assessments I've seen
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2012/3116/FS12-3116.pdf

Permalink Reply by Richard Cotterman on October 9, 2012 at 10:20am

Thanks Brian for the link.

What does everyone think of the new map? It looks like a bunch of rehash to me. Old info.

Permalink Reply by BrianH on October 9, 2012 at 10:44am

I like the USGS Utica Map, it’s clear and provide great explanations. I'm waiting on the ODNR to issue their latest and greatest. ODNR is late, it was promised by the end of September.

 I’m waiting to see how EXXON/XTO will proceed with their well and permits in Belmont.