Tags:
Permalink Reply by JREwing on February 18, 2014 at 3:48am I hope that the poor production #'s have more to do with lack of infrastructure than actual well potential. The numbers are not encouraging, but that doesn't seem to be slowing Hilcorp or Chevron down...
Permalink Reply by JohnL on February 18, 2014 at 12:48pm
Permalink Reply by Bruce H on March 30, 2014 at 11:03am The James well is now listed in the production report.
Gas quantity 312100 mcf
condensate quantity 11.6 bbl
Both for 153 days production
I believe they reported for their wells in Lawrence Co also. Check above link to view.
Permalink Reply by deer spotter on March 30, 2014 at 11:17am poor numbers
dean alan wohnhas replied to John W. Howard, CPL's discussion 'the Marcellus Shale - Its History and Importance to Both Appalachia and America'
Brett replied to John W. Howard, CPL's discussion 'the Marcellus Shale - Its History and Importance to Both Appalachia and America'
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com