Interested Party's Discussions (38)

Discussions Replied To (29) Replies Latest Activity

"Did you ever play poker? Drilling here will be "mind boggling" if other shale/limest…"

Interested Party replied Oct 19, 2010 to Snyder Brothers Marcellus Lease

50 Oct 16, 2011
Reply by Sam Douglass

"very nice"

Interested Party replied Oct 19, 2010 to Snyder Brothers Marcellus Lease

50 Oct 16, 2011
Reply by Sam Douglass

"Janice, There are many and varied situations to consider. Development is and will be…"

Interested Party replied Oct 18, 2010 to Snyder Brothers Marcellus Lease

50 Oct 16, 2011
Reply by Sam Douglass

"DId MDS add the Pugh Clause (item H) to their addendum like you did? The only other…"

Interested Party replied Oct 18, 2010 to Snyder Brothers Marcellus Lease

50 Oct 16, 2011
Reply by Sam Douglass

"Sounds like the KAP offer is better -- same money for 5 years vs the MDS 10 year dea…"

Interested Party replied Oct 18, 2010 to Snyder Brothers Marcellus Lease

50 Oct 16, 2011
Reply by Sam Douglass

"OK. That makes sense. I see the lease on your website is an initial five year term (…"

Interested Party replied Oct 18, 2010 to Snyder Brothers Marcellus Lease

50 Oct 16, 2011
Reply by Sam Douglass

"I just went over a lease copy I have in hand from this past summer and then noticed…"

Interested Party replied Oct 17, 2010 to Snyder Brothers Marcellus Lease

50 Oct 16, 2011
Reply by Sam Douglass

"Have read that article previously. As I said, the MDS lease EXCLUDES the strata belo…"

Interested Party replied Oct 10, 2010 to Snyder Brothers Marcellus Lease

50 Oct 16, 2011
Reply by Sam Douglass

"Sam, There is a depth clause in the MDS/Snyder lease addendum that reads: "This leas…"

Interested Party replied Oct 10, 2010 to Snyder Brothers Marcellus Lease

50 Oct 16, 2011
Reply by Sam Douglass

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service