James Brink, Esq.'s Discussions (138)

Discussions Replied To (68) Replies Latest Activity

"You have to review the Order of Payment. This document sets forth the "contingencies…"

James Brink, Esq. replied Feb 11, 2013 to M&P BEING SUED / CLASS-ACTION SUIT AGAINST HALCON, M&P & CX

431 Nov 13, 2014
Reply by Rockjul

"No argument there from me! I have seen it all in 30 years of practicing law."

James Brink, Esq. replied Feb 11, 2013 to M&P BEING SUED / CLASS-ACTION SUIT AGAINST HALCON, M&P & CX

431 Nov 13, 2014
Reply by Rockjul

"Samuel:  There is no lawsuit in the works for several reasons.  First, what were the…"

James Brink, Esq. replied Feb 11, 2013 to M&P BEING SUED / CLASS-ACTION SUIT AGAINST HALCON, M&P & CX

431 Nov 13, 2014
Reply by Rockjul

"Daniel Rupert:  If you would add me as your friend on this site, I would like to tal…"

James Brink, Esq. replied Feb 11, 2013 to M&P BEING SUED / CLASS-ACTION SUIT AGAINST HALCON, M&P & CX

431 Nov 13, 2014
Reply by Rockjul

"I'll answer your question.  A farmout is generally used by a lessee when, for whatev…"

James Brink, Esq. replied Jan 18, 2013 to Explain a FARMOUT AGREEMENT

47 Jan 18, 2013

"That's right.  Any any lawyer who you may retain should spend the bulk of his/her ti…"

James Brink, Esq. replied Nov 3, 2011 to Misleading Shell landman

41 Nov 3, 2011
Reply by James Brink, Esq.

"Exactly.  That is why it is vitally important to know who you are dealing with in th…"

James Brink, Esq. replied Nov 3, 2011 to Misleading Shell landman

41 Nov 3, 2011
Reply by James Brink, Esq.

"Not entirely true.  There are a few attorneys among us who have worked for the gas c…"

James Brink, Esq. replied Nov 2, 2011 to Misleading Shell landman

41 Nov 3, 2011
Reply by James Brink, Esq.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service