A Thai-Japanese partnership is looking at the possibility a building a cracker plant in the Appalachian Basin. This is the third cracker that has been proposed for the region. If all three are built, this area could become 'the Silicon Valley of the plastics industry.'
http://powersource.post-gazette.com/powersource/companies-powersour...
Tags:
At last this news is out! No I do not have an inside track. I just read and search. And for all of you on this site who say that corporate presentations released to the public are not valuable here is why they are. Because there are clues in those presentations in the details.
When reading the July presentation by Magnum Hunter on page 63 the heading is "Ethane Projects" and it stated . Local projects: Shell, Braskem, PTT and others
Now ask yourself why does Magnum Hunter have that in their presentation? Does it mean PTT is looking at sites where Magnum Hunter has leased acreage? I don't know. I am just asking the question
All three are on the river. I know one of Shell's criteria was barge access. Was it for raw materials, finished product or for bringing in pre-fabbed equipment? Don't know as they didn't say but I am assuming it is for all of the above. Certainly much of the equipment will be manufactured in La or Tx where they have the expertize and experience in making such equipment
But bringing in ethane or shipping out ethylene by barge is also pretty important, I imagine Especially in the early years before new end-user plants are built nearby. Don't know how much water is used by crackers though.
The big ? is there enough ethane to supply three crackers and/or enough demand for their product? Way above my pay grade there. May be enough for more than that for all I know. I suspect they don't know for sure at this point. Time will tell.
Jim,
A while back, I saw several charts predicting sufficient ethane supply in the Utica/Marcellus to support ~6 crackers the size of Shell's. If anything, actual ethane supply has proven to be even higher. In the meantime, plans are in progress to build mega-ships to transport ethane to Europe for their crackers, most currently fueled by mideast-supplied naptha, a crude oil derivative. Seems to me that economics favor retaining the ethane in the Utica/Marcellus region....it must cost a fortune to process and transport ethane, first by Mariner East pipeline to the east coast and then to Europe via ship.
Further clouding the water is the current over-supply of crude oil in the US and declining prices vs increasing prices for natural gas (ethane prices follow NG prices). Will the current huge price disparity of crude vs NG on an equivalent BTU basis continue?
Unfortunately, the answers to these questions are also way above my pay grade! But at least it is good to understand the factors involved. Furthermore, there are likely other factors I've overlooked, such as when does the world ethylene supply reach saturation and price discounting set in??
IMHO,
BluFlame
pa. elects wolf and there won't be a cracker.
Rusty Braziel at RBNEnergy.com refered to the ethane market as the "ethane asylum". On my latest check stub from XTO the ethane sold for 19 cents/gallon.
From what I read on sites like RBN Energy it seems as though there will be a surplus of ethane for a LONG time.
Phil
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com