Hey Clinton Supporters! HilLIARy admits she is against shale development! Still want to vote for her?

A young lady asked HilLARy if she supported "frackiing". To paraphrase her answer, she said no.

So a HilLARy Presidency means the end of the economic benefits resulting from shale development; the end to the jobs created by shale development; the end of increased tax revenue to struggling local governments and school districts.

If you vote for HilLIARy you are voting against the well being of your families, your children, your friends. You are voting against the well being of your communities.

How will you live with yourselves? Traitors!

Views: 1743

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by JK on March 8, 2016 at 2:55pm

Haven't we had enough of the Clintons?

She will not have my vote.

Permalink Reply by Barry D on March 8, 2016 at 4:55pm

JK,

But there are plenty of HilLIARy supporters that view this site.

But none of them will have the courage to admit they supporter her.

The reason they won't respond is because they know they can't cite one "positive" accomplishment of hers.

Sure we have the failure in Libya (her policy) and the resulting deaths of 4 Americans in Benghazi which she tired to cover up.

Her failed policy with Putin, where he has spit in her face.

Her failed policy in Iraq and Syria where 10's of thousands are being slaughtered because her failed policies.

Shall I go on?

Even if her supporters could cite one accomplishment, which they can't, could it overcome her policy failures? Could it overcome the death and destruction her failed policies have caused?

Of course not.

Now these fools are willing to support her anti oil and gas development policy as if it is good for our country.

The people who support a HilLIARy or Bernie the communist are the problem with this country.

We have a chance for economic resurgence with shale development and these fools would kill it.

Sad. Yes we have had enough of the Clintons and the other far leftists, Progressives and communists that populate the Democrat Party (not Democratic)

Permalink Reply by karen brown on March 14, 2016 at 3:20pm

well stated, I will never vote for her. follow trey gowdy investigation of Bengazi, she just skirts around every question.  I pray she does not get elected for if she does there is no hope for our country

Permalink Reply by Frank Walker on March 8, 2016 at 4:00pm

Hillary is Mrs. Santa Claus.  She will get all of the Santa Claus vote this November.

Permalink Reply by st. croix on March 9, 2016 at 3:22pm
By all means I'm not a Hilzs supporter but if big oil is flat out stealing this stuff from us And all of the negative interactions that have taken place along with them claiming they paid $8,000 but only receiving $2,500. The end product will be a attorney making all the $$$$ so with that said I say leave that crap in the ground. It's been more of a headache than anything. when the compressor is cranking I forget what it sounds like to here a deer walking in the leaves while I'm sitting in a tree stand. I guess you could say I've turned into a NiMBY!
Permalink Reply by Jon on March 14, 2016 at 3:31pm

Then there are the people that were saved from bankruptcy by the bonus money

Permalink Reply by Skid on March 14, 2016 at 10:50am

This traitor (WHAT?! My life and all my choices are not dictated by shale development first and foremost ) is voting against Mr.Trump in the Ohio primary tomorrow and for whomever the Democrat is on the ballot in November. If it is Mrs.Clinton so be it.

If that acknowledgement nauseates you, take a moment to recall how you became so certain about Mrs. Clinton. Was it a biased, pre-digested "news" source? Are you repeating things you have heard repeatedly on talk radio? From where are you getting your information? Are they reputable sources? It has become common to live in a protective bubble, restricting what we watch and hear to thode things that further confirm our own hopes, fears and beliefs. And then its a simple matter of characterizing everything as good versus evil. Reading a balance of news sources takes some work, but I think that is what our forefathers meant by an 'educated electorate' being an essential ingredient in a democracy.

For the first time in my 63 years I will ask for an R ballot and vote for Kasich with the hope that he carries Ohio.I am taking this step to do what I can to knock Mr. Trump off his seat as front runner.

I don't mind being called a leftist or progressive but name calling fails to advance the discussion. What matters to me more is that for about five decades white Republicans and in some instances white Democrats have listened to subtle messages from their political leaders. These messages arouse fear and or anger about people who are different and suggest that our government, by helping people through social programs is not serving the interests of white people. Somehow reducing government powers and delivering MORE resources to people who are wealthy and run corporations is going to make things better? Not for me or you. Do you realize that every time you are convinced to vote against social programs or immigration or give tax breaks to corporations you are ultimately harming what remains of the middle class? Really, look at what is happening to our quality of life. Those revenues that were going to trickle down when we gave tax breaks to the wealthy in 1980? Still waiting.

The next time you hear anti-government sentiment take a minute to think about who ultimately benefits from a broken government. It is NOT you or me. So stop voting for leaders who only weaken the powers of government, or fail to carry out their duties, or think a shutdown is a solution--we are the government!!

And vote out  political leaders who are allowing the process to be co-opted by corporate dollars and by corporate lobbyists. WE vote and our leaders should work for us!! Stop letting them tell you  that you have to fear people who are different than you. You are being held hostage by your fears. Put your anger where it belongs. Too many politicians work for big money, not me or you.

The next time some politician tells you about the 42% of the population that wants a hand out, ask him which corporation is funding his campaign -oh, that's right. That information no longer has to be disclosed.

You are not the only one who can rant. 

Permalink Reply by Barry D on March 14, 2016 at 1:22pm

Skid,

My post was based on her own words; words I heard and watched her say.

If you are concerned by corporate dollars then you wouldn't want to vote for HiLIARy.

She is bought and paid for by corporate America.

Permalink Reply by Frank Walker on March 15, 2016 at 1:05am

"You are not the only one who can rant."

OK, I'll be brief.  Your rant reads like it was written by a radically liberal woman.

Are you a feminazi? 

Permalink Reply by Skid on March 15, 2016 at 2:16am

Barry D, I am very concerned about corporate dollars and Mrs.Clinton's obligations to corporations. you and I share that concern, although we may choose to resolve the dilemma differently. Do you think there are candidates in the race who are less tied to corporate dollars?

Frank Walker, So you read my comments - or at least breezed through them- thank you very much for that. Then you came to this conclusion: "written by a radically liberal woman" and wanted to know if I'm a feminazi?

Maybe you missed the my part about name calling: it does not advance the discussion.

So I googled "feminazi" and found out it is a word used to describe radical feminists, especially those who think all men are stupid.Okay. Its not altogether clear how you arrived at that but I understand the urge to label people because if you can assign a label you can then use that to order your world. You can decide whether to discount me or take me seriously. You can decide if I'm on your side or against you. The urge is strong to reduce the ambivalence we experience. But you miss a lot when you do that. I am so much more than a label and I suspect that you are, too.

Then there is always the possibility that you asked the question as an entreaty with the hope of getting an a quarrel going, or to place me on the defensive. Or, perhaps you wanted to make me shut up. Well, whatever the case I just need to tell you that I believe strongly in civility. While I can not insist on it from you, or anyone, I can at least respond with the politeness that makes discourse more enjoyable.

So thank you for reading and responding. Was there anything in what I wrote that you found worthy of further discussion?

Permalink Reply by Frank Walker on March 15, 2016 at 2:41am

Sorry.  I only read one rant per week.  Your earlier one used up your quota for a while.

Permalink Reply by Barry D on March 15, 2016 at 3:43am

Skid,

For the sake of discussion on this site I am primarily concerned with which candidate(s) support oil and gas development and in particular shale development in this country. It is more than obvious that neither Mrs. Clinton nor Senator Sanders do.

That leaves the Republican side of the ballot. At this point each of the remaining hopefuls has expressed their support of oil and gas development in general and shale development in particular.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service