I am told they are independent Analysts.....They do not own any land or have any leases of land in the Utica..........Very interesting map......I have no Idea as to their ability to be correct in their opinion. I am just the messanger .......but it should create some interesting conversations........

Views: 8015

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I like the maps.......puts the hot spot line right over me in Tusc.

 

I agree....results speak volumes

Hi Paul,

Where are you in Tuscarawas County?  I am in Gnaden.

I am just East of New Phila.

I agree Joe. I don't read a lot into all these different maps. I think they are useful but the actual drilling is concrete news. I think it is going to be years before any certainty can be predicted in counties with limited data points. Drilling a bit in the ground is the only way to know for sure.

I like this map. I hope it is accurate. LOL.

Isn't this exerpt from Dan Jarvie inline with what the so called experts are telling all of you in the western oil window?

“The Parshall field has proven to be a major field covering more than 3840 km2 (950,000 ac). The North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources projects estimated recoverable oil at 3.331 _ 108 m3 (2.1 billion bbl), representing less than 1.5% of OIP (Johnson, 2009).

However, this area of the Williston Basinwas largely ignored because it was thought that it was too immature for petroleum generation and the Middle Member was too tight to serve as a conduit and reservoir for migrated hydrocarbons. Upper Bakken Shale in this area is classically characterized as immature to earliest oil window thermal maturity (%Roe from Tmax of 0.58–0.65). The lower%Roe fromTmax (0.58) is from whole rock that contains both oil and kerogen, whereas the upper value (0.65% Roe) is from extracted rock, which is only kerogen and more accurate. This also demonstrates that some oil carryover into the Rock-Eval S2 peak also exists, even in the presence of high API gravity oil. When normalized to TOC, extracted oil from S2 retained in the Bakken Shale exceeds 100 mg/g, thereby occupying most of the sorptive sites in the organic matter, meaning free oil in Rock-Eval S1 is largely movable oil (Jarvie et al., 2011).”

 

Attachments:

I wonder who hired and paid the analysts to generate their report and map ?

Could it be............pause............S    A   T   A   N   ? ? ?

How does everyone always put it - follow the money.

ITG....Investment Technology Grpup...would appear they are an "Investment Research Group".....HOME PAGE... http://energy.itginvestmentresearch.com/main/index.php?q=content/ac... ....check them out.


Activity Maps

We produce detailed maps of key plays that compile our geological, operational, production, financial and regulatory insight into a color-coded analysis. This allows clients to identify regions of the Bakken Formation, for example, that are economic at various oil prices and which companies own land in these regions.

Our map series enhance our written reports and aid in communicating new insights to clients,

Geez !

Not even one LOL !

Is this one liner too old to get a chuckle already ?

You folks remember SNL's 'Church Lady' skit by Dana Carvey don't you ?

Looks like I'm not going anywhere as a 'stand-up' either !

I'd like to see what these so called "experts" had to say about the Bakken play back in its infancy...I'm sure they all condemned it as as well!

The map is similar to other maps I've seen. Interesting that there are not many wells noted by name, and few in the southern region. The best map I've seen is on Antero's monthly investors' report. June's report is now on their website. If you haven't seen the Antero Utica map, it's worth a look.

BluFlame

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service