I will try to keep this as short as possible. Situation Family member owns 197 acres Minerals and surface. Leases mineral rights on 197 acres. Then sells two 53 acre tracts off the surface, with no mention of the lease or giving mineral rights to the new surface owner in either of the deeds. Without mentioning the mineral rights lease how is this perceived. Did he loose the leases and mineral rights on the land he sold or does the lease supersede the sale. Any help would be appreciated
Tags:
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com