I am looking for language that limits the unit size per well. For instance, even if you say a unit will be limited to 640 acres, we all would want more than 1 well per 640 acres, preferably 6 or 7 or 8 wells per a 640 acre unit.
Tags:
Thank you rmc, this is what I was looking for, but why did you say 120 acres plus 10 percent, why didn't you just say 132 acres? what is the 10 percent from?
a pugh clause would cause a company, at the end of a lease term, to release back to the landowner any acreage that was not included in a unit. (currently proposed in PA senate bill 356). I am not sure why anybody would sign a lease without it, otherwise they could put just one acre of a property into a unit and then hold the entire property as under production forever.
fwiw unless you are a qualified geologist, you don't know what # is right. Even the qualified don't know the ideal spacing at hthis early point. The lessee, gasco, wants to maximise extraction, usually in line with
lessor's objective as well.
The Lessors objectives are counter to that of the Lessee during the leasing process. After the lease is signed you may find that they are still not your best buddy. Numerous producers are and will continue to drill single wells in a unit to hold that unit under production, then move on and do the same to hold other units.
As a landowner you would want to first get 100% of your land unitized, then you would want them to max the # of wells drilled into the max # of strata. So as you see, after leasing your interests are more in line but may never be 100%.
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com