New study reveals: "No signature elements associated with Marcellus Shale"

To all of the fear mongers, every day new studies are concluded and refute the anti-fracing claims. Here is yet one more nail for the coffin:

http://www.lockhaven.com/page/content.detail/id/549269/Researcher--...

 Some of you on here, and you know who you are, keep stating wild claims without scientific proof to support your arguments. Most long-time GMSers will not listen to unsubstantiated claims that cloud the conversation here. If you want to keep up, follow the lead of this post - support your words with credible sources of information.

Views: 1168

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Mark McGrail on January 30, 2014 at 1:56am

David,

Thanks for the good news.

I assume no purple squirrels were sighted along the stretch of river.

Permalink Reply by David Perotto on January 30, 2014 at 2:13am

Ah yes, the purple squirrels, that was a funny discussion.

Permalink Reply by Jim Litwinowicz on January 30, 2014 at 3:32am

David; nice find.  Note that it said "no significant or measurable amounts (significance added).  They can measure some pretty low levels so to say that is pretty significant, IMO.

But note that this made no paper's headlines, no tv interviews or video of people taking samples.  Yet let one clown show up with a bottle of muddy water claiming pollution and he/she will be shown on all media for days.  Hard to fight that kinda biased coverage.

Permalink Reply by David Perotto on January 30, 2014 at 3:40am

You wouldn't be referring to Craig "jug a wata" Sautner would you?

Permalink Reply by Jim Litwinowicz on January 30, 2014 at 4:59am

He  is just one of many.  There is a woman near me that does the same magic act. And they get the hews coverage while the truth does not.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service