skill, talent, experience, personalty, style- persons? no gas companies, do they vary? and how!

Not that unusual but for any of us following PA Marcellus successes, the example couldnt be any better. Do company mgmt styles and skils vary and what does it mean?

 Look at the prices of COG, XCO, RRC, PVA, CHK, SWN and what am I missing? Online you can find any # of sites with charts that goes back several years, use weekly or monthly data.

 PVR Penn Virginia, they do important work in erecting pipelines, we need them in Lycoming Cnty etc but as natural gas scouts, terrible, their focus was Potter County. While I hope all is not gone for our brethren there, but to date there are no worthy results.

 COG with RRC just behind, Cabot and Range that is, are leaders in having chosen areas proving to be very productive. Depth, thickness, richness can be gleaned from old well logs, free to anyone from the DCNR. The H.Wesley Pease well, 20006,  1973, Shell Oil, attracted COG to Susquehanna.

 SWN, Southwestern is producing 2 Billion cu ft a day from their Fayetteville assert (shale experts) and though their Marcellus position is much smaller, they have only a small % that is non-prospective. E Bradford, C E Susquehanna and their Lycoming land all looks very good.

 Exco, XCO, partially owned by took on land in southern Wayne County, Lackawanna and other poor choices. W Centre, appears marginal, we will see. They bought Lycoming leases and wells from Chief, which is producing but even that, far E Lycoming is grade B.

 Chesapeake obviously has tremendous land in Bradford and SW Susquehanna, but the bulk of their claimed Marcellus position is lacking according to regional practitioners. Their step on anyone style hasn’t seemed to matter, seems no one likes them. Does anyone have an opinion on whether their rep will affect re-leasing objectives? Will landowners have other choices?

 

Thanks for listening, just sharing what I pick up, believed to be accurate but no guarantees.

Humpherys

+++

COG is at all time highs, up 300% in 3 years. PVR is 4, sinking fast down from 80, yikes. Exco, dead in the water, sinking over time. Etc.

Views: 1066

Replies to This Discussion

--PVN, Penn Virginia in Potter County, stating they are terrible natural gas scouts for focusing on Potter.  I hope that is not the reality. Comments.

Maybe this needs to be stated as opinion. PVN common collasped 95% + since 2008- bad sign and it looks like they are having minimal exploratoion success. It is quite common talk throught the industry that far SW PA is very good and in the NE, upper Lycoming, upper Sullivan, much of Bradford and Susquehanna are very good and some of Tioga. East of Tioga just isn't putting up any #s, in PA DEP data, let alone talk.

Cabot and Range have concentrated portfolios of high grade geo areas and their stk proces reflect that- COG record new highs and RRC not far away - even with low gas prices.

For Potter and west area landowners,  lets hope the industry and Wall Street are wrong but the variance appears very significant.

 

Very disappointing, just the messenger here, Potter County, 2nd half 2012:

of 38 reported producing wells, 6 were running between 1&2 million cf/d.

Penn Virginia- 3 wells in Allegheny Twp, production negligable.

 

www.PAdep.gov

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service