From the communications dept:

"The progress report is scheduled to come out in mid December. The progress report won't have findings. It will provide more detailed information regarding the work underway to answer key study questions about the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources during the water acquisition stage. The draft report of results is scheduled for 2014 and will undergo an independent peer review."

I wonder what this means exactly? Will there be any hint regarding the EPA's intended direction?

 

Views: 696

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

What have you seen/heard? I think you are probably correct. They are putting a tad too big of an effort into this. Probably, like anything else, it will start out fairly minor and then expand and then become the behemoth that strangles the industry in similar fashion to the coal industry.

When they say water acquisition stage that means the gathering of water needed?
If yes, has anyone read of an area where too much was taken and it effected the supply? I haven't during any of my searches, but I may be totally off the mark here too in what they are talking about :0)

Redistribution, it maybe coming to a shale near you if we continue down Trotsky's path.

The API is concerned and it sounds like a valid concern.

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/262769-oil-and-gas-group-q...

The American Petroleum Institute (API) warned Thursday that EPA’s testing practices in Pavillion, Wyo., used too small a sample size to determine whether hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, contributed to groundwater contamination. The group said that could have far-reaching implications for EPA's national study on that linkage.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service