From the communications dept:
"The progress report is scheduled to come out in mid December. The progress report won't have findings. It will provide more detailed information regarding the work underway to answer key study questions about the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources during the water acquisition stage. The draft report of results is scheduled for 2014 and will undergo an independent peer review."
I wonder what this means exactly? Will there be any hint regarding the EPA's intended direction?
Tags:
What have you seen/heard? I think you are probably correct. They are putting a tad too big of an effort into this. Probably, like anything else, it will start out fairly minor and then expand and then become the behemoth that strangles the industry in similar fashion to the coal industry.
Redistribution, it maybe coming to a shale near you if we continue down Trotsky's path.
The API is concerned and it sounds like a valid concern.
http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/262769-oil-and-gas-group-q...
The American Petroleum Institute (API) warned Thursday that EPA’s testing practices in Pavillion, Wyo., used too small a sample size to determine whether hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, contributed to groundwater contamination. The group said that could have far-reaching implications for EPA's national study on that linkage.
© 2024 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com