Presentation by Range Resources Engineer
See Page 8
I was told by VanMeter (Engineer above) that if the Marcellus is wet, the Burkett is wet also. In fact the Burkett is proving to be slightly wetter than the Marcellus below it.
Regards,
Phil
Tags:
Permalink Reply by farmgas on September 6, 2013 at 12:13pm How is the Upper Devonian in the dry gas areas of central Pa in Indiana, Jefferson or Clearfield counties?
Permalink Reply by Philip Thackray on September 7, 2013 at 12:29am Farmgas,
On page 23 of the Range document the reservoir fairways are marked.
Phil
Permalink Reply by paleface on September 6, 2013 at 12:33pm Is the Marcellus the source rock for the Burket ?
Permalink Reply by Oliver Perry on September 6, 2013 at 12:45pm paleface,
It is my understanding that the Burkett Shale is a separate layer about 300' above the Marcellus.
Permalink Reply by paleface on September 6, 2013 at 12:57pm Hey Brian Powers are you out there help us out with this.
Permalink Reply by Philip Thackray on September 7, 2013 at 12:29am Paleface,
The Upper Devonian shales are separate organic packages. Not sourced by the Marcellus. Located as Oliver Perry describes.
Phil
Permalink Reply by paleface on September 7, 2013 at 2:36am This suggests western PA looks good it is data from 2010?https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/paper/10978/
Permalink Reply by Philip Thackray on September 7, 2013 at 3:31am Paleface,
Nice find. Table 2 shows Butler County among the highest Gamma Ray counts.
The Burkett (Upper Devonian) wells shown in the recent Rex and Range presentations lie within “Reservoir #1” shown on page 23 of the Range presentation linked above. The Isopach shown on page 7 (sorry I said page 8 above) of the linked Rex presentation is consistent with the Range presentation.
Range has stated that their first four Burkett wells outperformed their first four Marcellus wells (guessing that these we back in the 2004-5 time frame).
As I mentioned above, where the Marcellus is wet, the Burkett is wet. So as we move eastward, the Burkett will be dry.
Regards,
Phil
Permalink Reply by paleface on September 7, 2013 at 4:01am It shows a good organic percentage per volume and weight and a good reservoir seal if it was made there it didn't have to travel and 150ft. thick in spots.Whats not to like.
Permalink Reply by Philip Thackray on September 7, 2013 at 4:16am And you have the pad and all the mid-stream stuff in place from the Marcellus drilling!!
Phil
Jeff replied to Petroleum Attorney 1976's discussion 'FYI- Mineral Owners in the State of Ohio (Utica Shale area's)'
dean alan wohnhas replied to John W. Howard, CPL's discussion 'the Marcellus Shale - Its History and Importance to Both Appalachia and America'
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com