Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Gary on September 6, 2013 at 7:08am

I'm not sure how to get to page 63..can you add the link.

Permalink Reply by Jason on September 6, 2013 at 7:54am

Date listed is 12/30/2011
Book 3404522

It's 316 pages long. No time to go through it.

Permalink Reply by craig on September 6, 2013 at 8:52am

The only documents I can find are from 2011 and it was Ohio Buckeye and 3 CHK affiliates transferring leases TO CHK Utica, not to Ohio Buckeye. A link would be nice if this is true.

Permalink Reply by industry resident on September 6, 2013 at 3:52pm

its on there -i searched industry and my name -- came up page 63 -  http://www.searchiqs.com/pabea/UserFrame.htm

try your name if you have a lease

Permalink Reply by craig on September 9, 2013 at 8:21am

OK,  Here's what it is:

First off this is a restatement/amendment to the original assignment of leases FROM 3 CHK companies and Ohio Buckeye TO CHK Utica. So these were NOT sold to Ohio Buckeye, but Ohio Buckeye sold 72% of their interest to CHK Utica,  originally filed in 2011.

I believe OHio Buckeye is part of the company that originally signed up Beaver County, and when they sold all their leases to CHK they kept a certain amount of interest and in 2011 they sold 72% of that part of the leases they kept. I don't know this for a fact tho.

Hope this helps.

Permalink Reply by Gary on November 20, 2013 at 12:27pm

Any rumors of this Beaver county acreage sale..mine is that CHK was asking to much for the acreage..but RRC wants to buy..

Permalink Reply by craig on November 21, 2013 at 7:37am

I've heard no rumors along these lines, but one never knows what they are up to. Like they say:  Watch what they do, not what they say.

Permalink Reply by Todd on November 22, 2013 at 7:17am

I wonder...  My lease was signed with Fortuna (now known as Talisman) in 2007 then, 6 months later, Range bought it, then, in 2011 CHK took over, drilled in 2012 and placed into a unit in Hancock County 1 mi west of Hanover TWP, BC on Hardins Run.

Seitel is conducting 3D seismic for a large area in BC south of the river with both CHK and RRC leases but I'm hearing that RRC is paying for the shoot?

Good advice from Craig... I heard another operator was interested in Hancock recently and then the local attorney has not returned anyone's calls!  "Watch what they do, not what they say." - Wise words

Permalink Reply by craig on November 22, 2013 at 2:05pm

It's funny that you mention that you heard RRC is paying for the shoot when just today a customer of ours that lives in the middle of the Seitel shoot area said that a Seitel employee told him that Shell had paid mucho dollars for the shoot as well. I wonder how much this shoot will cost and is it possible all 3 companies chipped in to pay for it?

Permalink Reply by Jason on November 22, 2013 at 2:18pm

Wow Craig - that's interesting. I can tell you first hand that the first guy from Seitel I saw was back on August 13. It seems the area they are shooting keeps growing. About three weeks ago I was on Flaugherty Run road of moon Twp and thumper trucks were actively testing at 500 (it was almost dark).

Permalink Reply by Gary on November 22, 2013 at 3:05pm

When Seitel talked to me they showed me verification letters from RRC and CHK that they were paying Seitel for doing the seismic ..Shell wasn't mentioned but that was last summer things seem to change fast.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page