David R. Hill

Rumors are David R. Hill is in the Licking Valley area Of Licking county  trying to lease you land BEWARE!!!!!!!!!

Views: 6328

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Billy Park Whyde on April 23, 2012 at 5:26am

Could this be the reason?

WELL SUMMARY
OHIO DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Logging Co. Appalchian Well Surveys Core No. Sample No. API Well Number 34089257140000
Log Types Perforating Depth Control, Perforating, Gamma Ray-Neutron,Density, Resistivity, Caliper, Density, Spectral density, Slim hole density, Vari, Gamma Ray, Radioactivity, Neutron Permit Issued 10/6/2000
County LICKING Township UNION Quadrangle MILLERSPORT Zone S
Section 10 Lot 15 Tract Twp. Qtr.
Surface X 1997386 Y 710708 Bottom X        Y         NAD27
Surface Lon -82.509323 Lat 39.951325 Bottom Lon Lat  NAD27
Surface X 1965992 Y 710745 Bottom X Y  NAD83 SPS
Measured 1720'NL & 480'WL OF LOT 15,SEC. 10
Prop TD 4200 Class EDPW Tool RTAF
Landowner PAINTER Acres 40 Well No. 1 Date Commenced 12/4/2000
Owner HILL DAVID R INC Well No. Date Completed 12/13/2000
GL 927 DF KB 933 LTD 4170 DTD 4149 PB Depth Date PB
TD Form. ROSE RUN SANDSTONE Prod. Form. ROSE RUN SANDSTONE Status Producing
IP Natural IP AT 60 MCF & 175 BO Initial Rock Pressure Date Abandoned
Perforations PI: 4107-4125, Date: 12/22/2000, S/Ft: 36, # Shots: 36
Stimulations SI: 4107-4125, Fmtn Cd: 367020, Stim In: CS, Type: ACID, Vol: 200 Gal
Casing Record COND 12 0-120  SURF 8.625 0-629-0, Comment: 629, Sks: 160  T1 2.375 0-4101  PROD 4.5 0-4159  

Formations
Formation Top Bottom Source Prod. Non-Standard Remarks
BEREA SANDSTONE 507 529 Log No
BIG LIME 1390 2050 Log No
PACKER SHELL 2170 2184 Log No
CLINTON SAND 2192 2226 Log No
QUEENSTON FORMATION 2322 Log No
TRENTON LIMESTONE 3500 Log No
GULL RIVER FORMATION 4015 4056 Log No
ROSE RUN SANDSTONE 4056 4153 Log Yes SHOW OIL & GAS
TREMPEALEAU FORMATION 4153 Driller No


Annual Production
Year Source Oil Gas Water Remarks
2001 DMRM 43682 15674 60
2002 DMRM 34041 15757 0
2003 DMRM 30492 22110 0
2004 DMRM 29604 32955 0
2005 DMRM 29034 44124 0
2006 DMRM 25869 60218 0
2007 DMRM 18320 69397 0
2008 DMRM 14060 51233 0
2009 DMRM 11651 41212 0
2010 DMRM 9380 36306 0
Permalink Reply by Billy Park Whyde on April 23, 2012 at 11:00am

Jodi that was a vetical well with less of a formation fracked than the ones  that were horozontal!

0i7okn54zwbdoPermalink Reply by 0i7okn54zwbdo on April 23, 2012 at 3:26pm

The Trempealeau and Rose Run have been producing a lot of oil out that way for decades.  There was a mini boom in Morrow county in the 60's.  Oil in the Trempealeau or Rose Run is indicative of nothing more than oil in the Trempealeau or Rose Run.  

Permalink Reply by scott david gill on April 24, 2012 at 5:40pm

FYI to anyone interested - Morrow County landowner meeting on 4/26/12 @ Mount Gilead H.S. - 7:00pm.  Someone from ODNR will be speaking.  This is NOT a Dan Plumley represented group, so it offers a different view from their hired reps as to what the future may hold.  Went to a meeting several months ago and they were throwing out some big numbers ($$$). 

Permalink Reply by scott david gill on April 26, 2012 at 10:44am

meeting is at cardington h.s. - not mount gilead - 7p

Permalink Reply by Billy Park Whyde on April 26, 2012 at 12:07pm

Hey Jodi let us all know! lol

Permalink Reply by scott david gill on April 26, 2012 at 5:41pm

billy - no problem sending my replies to others.  i believe muskingum was shown in their liquid gas window, which was also very thin, but i'm speculating that both of these windows were only showing the area that they are planning to concentrate on.  it was a little curious though that they showed nothing west of knox.

one other morrow county nugget - 11 million barrels of oil were cultivated during the 60's oil boom in morrow cty, which probably all migrated originally from the utica shale layer to other layers(tough to wrap my tiny brain around that one - a little help please marcus!)

 

Permalink Reply by scott david gill on April 26, 2012 at 5:11pm

Chris Perry from ODNR gave a PP presentation.  Here's the highlights from him as well as the group's leader:

  1. showed a couple of devon slides that I've not seen before - one was their own version of the oil window which was much narrower than ODNR maps, but the good news was that licking, knox, ashland, and richland were 100% in.  also a slide comparing the harstine TOC w/ the other big-time shale plays in the US - eye popping (not news to you jodi)
  2. mr. perry also alluded to a theory that devon might turn out to be the smartest player by concentrating on the western edge (but this should be tempered on who his audience was)
  3. unconfirmed rumors of bonus pmt offers in the 5-6,000 range for several landowners in the sparta area (extreme eastern morrow cty)
  4. eichelberger (ashland) core samples apparently were saturated with oil (based on heresay)
Permalink Reply by Billy Park Whyde on April 26, 2012 at 5:14pm

ty Scott for the info , did ya happen to see where Muskingum was at in the Picture?  and ya mind if I copy and paste your info into the Licking  / Muskingum county Group?

Permalink Reply by Billy Park Whyde on April 25, 2012 at 4:39pm

 By the production of that well which was a vertical I wonder what the production would have been had it been a horizontal, more formation penetrated should = more oil correct? 

Permalink Reply by lynn on April 25, 2012 at 4:28pm

This is one of those times when it pays people to be VERY skeptical.  We are in eastern ohio, leased with chesapeake in december for a very pleasant amount after joining ALOV.  It could have been a totally different outcome since we were approached a year and a half before that by a landman who offered $100 an acre for all mineral rights.  First thing I did was research his company (internet is handy that way),  came to the conclusion that if they wanted the rights they wanted them because they could make a profit on them.   

RSS

© 2025   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service