HB 537: Another Intrusive And Obstructionist Bill Being Discussed In The Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee
HB 537:
Go to this link and read what's already being discussed and discuss it here if it's easier.
http://gomarcellusshale.com/forum/topics/hb-537-urbanized-area-in-w...
Write to the Representatives in Committee.
Throw it out.
Kill the Bill.
Views: 389
- Attachments:
-
-
HB 537 Full Bill.pdf, 30 KB
-
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on
-
If the State wants some of our Landowner Mineral Rights have them pay us for them.
How about $50,000.00 per acre U.S. ?
-
-
Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on
-
- Attachments:
-
-
SB 378 Full Bill.pdf, 39 KB
-
-
Top Content
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
Jeff replied to Petroleum Attorney 1976's discussion 'FYI- Mineral Owners in the State of Ohio (Utica Shale area's)'
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
Maybe this is just the State of Ohio Legislature's Standard Operating Procedure but I see that there is also a SB 378 (Senate Bill) generated Sponsored by Senator Schiavoni and Co-Sponsored by Senator Cafaro that deals with well setbacks and of course the Bills are in conflict as they pertain to paragraph 1509.021.
This SB 378 was introduced on 10/04/12 and assigned to a 'Agriculture, Environment & Natural Resources Committee.
This SB 378 has alot less to say and what it does say makes more sense to me.
This Bill allows Landowners to waive (in writing) the proximity of wells to dwellings.
I've saved the Bill to a pdf and also uploaded it to this discussion.
So what does everybody make of this situation as I don't know what to make of it ?