HB 537:
Go to this link and read what's already being discussed and discuss it here if it's easier.
http://gomarcellusshale.com/forum/topics/hb-537-urbanized-area-in-w...
Write to the Representatives in Committee.
Throw it out.
Kill the Bill.
Tags:
If the State wants some of our Landowner Mineral Rights have them pay us for them.
How about $50,000.00 per acre U.S. ?
© 2025 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher). Powered by
h2 | h2 | h2 |
---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com
Maybe this is just the State of Ohio Legislature's Standard Operating Procedure but I see that there is also a SB 378 (Senate Bill) generated Sponsored by Senator Schiavoni and Co-Sponsored by Senator Cafaro that deals with well setbacks and of course the Bills are in conflict as they pertain to paragraph 1509.021.
This SB 378 was introduced on 10/04/12 and assigned to a 'Agriculture, Environment & Natural Resources Committee.
This SB 378 has alot less to say and what it does say makes more sense to me.
This Bill allows Landowners to waive (in writing) the proximity of wells to dwellings.
I've saved the Bill to a pdf and also uploaded it to this discussion.
So what does everybody make of this situation as I don't know what to make of it ?