Marcellus in Eastern Ohio?

Hi,

Does anyone think eastern Ohio has enough Marcellus shale to worry about when drawing up or revising a lease? I know or was told it thins out coming into eastern Ohio (columbiana county) and is there anything that in time above the Marcellus or below it that may be worth something later?
If I revise my lease I might fight to have it say only from the queenston down since right now it says all except coal, gravel, etc. but I'm not sure it's worth it and if it would be better to try and get some other change. What I have no idea yet.
Kath

Views: 6621

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Finnbear on April 12, 2012 at 1:16pm

12463 gas in 44 days = 103386 mcf in a year. Another Marcellus well that won't pay for itself.

Permalink Reply by Finnbear on April 12, 2012 at 5:01pm

The Marcellus in PA is much thicker, potentially yielding more volume of gas.

Attachments:
Permalink Reply by Kathleen on April 12, 2012 at 6:50am
I searched all over that site and I can not find the Marcellus report so I emailed them asking where it is. As I was on the site it's clear the further south you go in parts of ohio the Marcellus is much thicker in the 5000-6000 range. More north it thins to around 3000-4000.
In PA where they drilled the most wells is 6000 and above.
Permalink Reply by Finnbear on April 12, 2012 at 1:09pm

The Marcellus is not that thick anywhere in Ohio. I'm not sure where you got them but those numbers are probably the depth to the Marcellus formation.

Permalink Reply by Kathleen on April 12, 2012 at 2:03pm
Your right It was the depth not thickness. I used this link and even though the thickness was right above the depth I used the wrong one.
http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/portals/10/energy/Marcellus_Utica_presen...
Permalink Reply by Utica Shale on April 22, 2012 at 4:41pm

Bill,

  $821,000/Year = 22.5 Barrels/day x 365 days/year x $100/Barrel

    $82,000/Year = 112 MCF/Day x 365 days/year x $2/mcf

  ====================

  $900,000 Totals Sales / Year

 

  Can the ORMET well ever be profitable ?

 

Permalink Reply by Randy on April 23, 2012 at 1:23am
Utica Shale,

It appears to me that every time something positive about the Marcellus in Ohio is posted here, you attempt to discredit it. Is it a coincidence that your user name is the same as the formation you seem to be promoting? The landowners of eastern Ohio need to realize that the oil companies leasing our lands will benfit greatly now and in the future by not divulging the potential of all the formations beneath us.....the Marcellus being the most obvious.
Permalink Reply by Billy Park Whyde on April 23, 2012 at 4:22am

What would this look like as a horizontal well?

WELL SUMMARY
OHIO DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Logging Co. Appalchian Well Surveys Core No. Sample No. API Well Number 34089257140000
Log Types Perforating Depth Control, Perforating, Gamma Ray-Neutron,Density, Resistivity, Caliper, Density, Spectral density, Slim hole density, Vari, Gamma Ray, Radioactivity, Neutron Permit Issued 10/6/2000
County LICKING Township UNION Quadrangle MILLERSPORT Zone S
Section 10 Lot 15 Tract Twp. Qtr.
Surface X 1997386 Y 710708 Bottom X        Y         NAD27
Surface Lon -82.509323 Lat 39.951325 Bottom Lon Lat  NAD27
Surface X 1965992 Y 710745 Bottom X Y  NAD83 SPS
Measured 1720'NL & 480'WL OF LOT 15,SEC. 10
Prop TD 4200 Class EDPW Tool RTAF
Landowner PAINTER Acres 40 Well No. 1 Date Commenced 12/4/2000
Owner HILL DAVID R INC Well No. Date Completed 12/13/2000
GL 927 DF KB 933 LTD 4170 DTD 4149 PB Depth Date PB
TD Form. ROSE RUN SANDSTONE Prod. Form. ROSE RUN SANDSTONE Status Producing
IP Natural IP AT 60 MCF & 175 BO Initial Rock Pressure Date Abandoned
Perforations PI: 4107-4125, Date: 12/22/2000, S/Ft: 36, # Shots: 36
Stimulations SI: 4107-4125, Fmtn Cd: 367020, Stim In: CS, Type: ACID, Vol: 200 Gal
Casing Record COND 12 0-120  SURF 8.625 0-629-0, Comment: 629, Sks: 160  T1 2.375 0-4101  PROD 4.5 0-4159  

Formations
Formation Top Bottom Source Prod. Non-Standard Remarks
BEREA SANDSTONE 507 529 Log No
BIG LIME 1390 2050 Log No
PACKER SHELL 2170 2184 Log No
CLINTON SAND 2192 2226 Log No
QUEENSTON FORMATION 2322 Log No
TRENTON LIMESTONE 3500 Log No
GULL RIVER FORMATION 4015 4056 Log No
ROSE RUN SANDSTONE 4056 4153 Log Yes SHOW OIL & GAS
TREMPEALEAU FORMATION 4153 Driller No


Annual Production
Year Source Oil Gas Water Remarks
2001 DMRM 43682 15674 60
2002 DMRM 34041 15757 0
2003 DMRM 30492 22110 0
2004 DMRM 29604 32955 0
2005 DMRM 29034 44124 0
2006 DMRM 25869 60218 0
2007 DMRM 18320 69397 0
2008 DMRM 14060 51233 0
2009 DMRM 11651 41212 0
2010 DMRM 9380 36306 0
Permalink Reply by Randy on April 23, 2012 at 5:24am
Just the kind of reply I expected. We are both making assumptions about the Marcellus in Ohio. Your's are negative, and mine are positve. Do you own land and/or mineral rights in Jefferson, Belmont, or Monroe counties? If you own land in Ohio, do you have Marcellus wells in your part of the state?
Permalink Reply by Finnbear on April 23, 2012 at 3:01pm

The Ormet well is being choked back due to lack of infrastructure. In the Appalachia MH April 2012 "Corporate Presentation" to investors, look closely at page 28 "Marcellus Operations" and the Ormet well reference.

Attachments:
Permalink Reply by Finnbear on April 24, 2012 at 5:36am

That's why I posted them. It all starts adding up when you look around a bit doesn't it?

Permalink Reply by Finnbear on April 12, 2012 at 1:12pm

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service