Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Madd man on October 12, 2012 at 5:37am

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Madd man on October 12, 2012 at 5:39am

Very interesting!

Check this out from the comments on the bottom of the webpage.

"Wouldn't want to be one of the workers there, sucking in the radiation from the Marcellus gas, but hey. It will produce more jobs when they kill off the workers one by one. Do your research folks. This is not a good thing."

This made my day haha.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bluflame on October 12, 2012 at 8:02am

Madd,

   It's a shame the respondent forgot to mention that fracking the P&G wells will pollute local water supplies with ugly methane gas. I guess that won't create more jobs by "killing off workers one-by-one". Where's Matt Damon when you need him?!? As long as the respondent is distorting facts, he might as well go for "The Full Monty"!

BluFlame

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mark ayers on October 12, 2012 at 9:34am

Any nat gas story appearing in the Scranton Times is almost always followed with comments like this, meanwhile the unemployment rate is at 9.6%, the city is bankrupt and they are paying 1990 prices for nat gas. Don't forget scrappy Joe Biden calls Scranton his home town (he left when he was 3), lotta help he is...

• ▶ Reply