Ok, lets suppose that Oil/Gas company "A" has thousands of acres leased & "Landowner Bill" has some land right in the middle of Oil/Gas company "A's" lease holdings. What if "Landowner Bill" is offered a lease by company "B" that is much more landowner friendly & has a somewhat substantially higher acreage bonus than that of company "A". Would "Landowner Bill" be better off signing with company "A" and almost be guaranteed to be put in a drilling/production unit in the near future & enjoy the royalty payments, or go for the better lease & acreage bonus & hope that company "B" sells the lease to company "A"?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by rmc on September 2, 2013 at 2:17am
Permalink Reply by Silver Dollar on September 2, 2013 at 2:44am thanks everyone for the input
Jeff replied to Petroleum Attorney 1976's discussion 'FYI- Mineral Owners in the State of Ohio (Utica Shale area's)'
dean alan wohnhas replied to John W. Howard, CPL's discussion 'the Marcellus Shale - Its History and Importance to Both Appalachia and America'
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com