According to the well log for Gulfport's Shugert 1-H1 the Utica has a thickness of 1011 feet. Is this correct or mistake in logging? Could this explain the production value of this well? I didnt…Continue
Tags: http://www2.dnr.state.oh.us/Website/DOG/WellSummaryCard.asp?api=34067210620000
Started this discussion. Last reply by Kangoo on Thursday.
Jason Grecco has not received any gifts yet
Kangoo replied to Jason Grecco's discussion 'Gulfport Shugert Utica Thickness'
Michael McGee replied to Jason Grecco's discussion 'Gulfport Shugert Utica Thickness'
The Hiker replied to Jason Grecco's discussion 'Gulfport Shugert Utica Thickness'
Donald replied to Jason Grecco's discussion 'Gulfport Shugert Utica Thickness'
Jason Grecco posted a discussion
Jason Grecco replied to jeffery mclaughlin's discussion 'Pipeline pictures Beaver twp Noble County Ohio'
Jason Grecco replied to Booger's discussion 'WTF DNR?'
Jason Grecco replied to searcherone's discussion '138 Pipelines planned for Ohio'
Jason Grecco replied to bo boboski's discussion 'ODNR On VACATION?'
Jason Grecco replied to Hunter's discussion 'Contacted by MarkWest for pipeline easement in Harrison county.' in the group Harrison County, OH
Jason Grecco replied to Hunter's discussion 'Contacted by MarkWest for pipeline easement in Harrison county.' in the group Harrison County, OH
Jason Grecco replied to Utica Shale's discussion 'Landowners face challenges with new leasing rules ...'
Jason Grecco replied to BrianH's discussion 'Utica Production Potential Map'
Jason Grecco replied to Tico's discussion 'UBELIEVABLE,, DID NOT SEE THIS COMING'
Jason Grecco replied to Utica Shale's discussion 'Markwest / Cadiz Update ...'Join Go Marcellus & Utica Shale: Leasing, Drilling & Mineral Rights
Patsy A. Andeson said… Our meeting Sunday eve. we thought went great. Jim McEvoy represented MarkWest. He had met with my husband and I earlier that week with the land agent Fred Hines.
Jim seemed very knowledgeable and satsified all of our questions. He wrote in things to clarify on the lease/addendum. All present agreed that if he would come back with the $15 a foot for pipeline and $25 a foot for damages, we would sign. He told me he would be on the phone with MarkWest in Denver, CO and would call me on Monday with results.
Monday about 11:00 we had a message from a Noel Glenn ( I think that is the correct name) from Mark West. She stated she was the project manager for this pipeline and wanted to meet with me. We played phone tag till Tuesday eve. I then spent an hour on the phone with her. Totally frustrating. Seems like we are almost back an square one. She said no way could she pay $15 and $25. She wanted to know if I could set up a meeting, have everyone bring their drivers' license and be prepared to sign.
I told her she'd better bring her best offer, cause as far as I was concerned this was their last chance, and the total of $40 a foot had been our asking price from day 1. She pretty much said this would just pull the plug on the whole project if we couldn't sign.
Will see how Sunday goes. I told her I would not speak for the rest of the group, but we would not sign for less. I wanted to tell her that after Sunday the price will go up $1.00 a foot a day for all the inconvenience they are causing.
Hope you don't mind my venting. We will probably still tell her we won't sign without the atty. looking it over again.
Patsy
Patsy A. Andeson said… We are asking $15 a foot for the initial pipeline that is to be 20?. $25.00 a foot for damages. Any additional lines we asked for $10 a foot up to a 20" line. Anything over 20" would be $1.00 an inch (ex.: 24" line would be $24.00 a foot, 36" line would be $36.00). They have not agreed to this.
I would think with your timber you would want to get an appraisal for the value now, plus what you will lose for the future 30-40 years growth that you will never recapture. Then see if that would come close to the damages per foot or go for actual damages.
What they came back with so far is only pertaining to the add'l. lines and it states: "Should a subsequest line exceed 20" in diameter, GRANTEE shall pay an additional $1.00 per linear foot of right-of-way for each additional inch in diameter pipe outside of 20" (ie, 24" pipe would be paid at $14.00 per linear foot of right-of-way, in lieu of the $10.00 per foot rate)."
At this moment this is as clear as mud to me. I imagine we will let an atty. look over the lease again before signing, even though Mark West wants it signed by the end of the month.
Patsy Anderson
Sign up for updates on local & national discussions and headlines in the shale industry. Stay informed!
243 members
246 members
125 members
324 members
60 members
218 members
150 members
568 members
418 members
178 members
Stay Connected
Like Us
Follow Us
Subscribe
Join our lists
© 2013 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Tools & Apps |
Copyright © 2012 GOMarcellusShale.com
advertisements

