Jason Grecco
  • Landowner
Share Twitter

Jason Grecco's Friends

  • wyalusing jim
  • Mark McGrail
  • Patsy A. Andeson
  • Mark Dolezal
  • bessieblues
  • Ron Eiselstein
  • Frank Dux
  • Hunter
  • Al Cramblett

Jason Grecco's Groups

Jason Grecco's Discussions

Gulfport Shugert Utica Thickness
4 Replies

According to the well log for Gulfport's Shugert 1-H1 the Utica has a thickness of 1011 feet.  Is this correct or mistake in logging?  Could this explain the production value of this well?   I didnt…Continue

Tags: http://www2.dnr.state.oh.us/Website/DOG/WellSummaryCard.asp?api=34067210620000

Started this discussion. Last reply by Kangoo on Thursday.

Gifts Received

Gift

Jason Grecco has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Jason Grecco's Page

Latest Activity

Kangoo replied to Jason Grecco's discussion 'Gulfport Shugert Utica Thickness'
"The Shugert Utica depths are MD (measure depth), meaning the depth measured along the curve that was built for the horizontal (there was no pilot hole in this well). This makes the Utica look a lot thicker than in TVD (true vertical depth). The lack…"
Thursday
Michael McGee replied to Jason Grecco's discussion 'Gulfport Shugert Utica Thickness'
"I had problems with the link also, but if you go to the Well Summary Card for the Shugert 1-12H well: http://www2.dnr.state.oh.us/Website/DOG/WellSummaryCard.asp?api=34013206580100 It has the Utica Shale formation starting at 8640 and bottom at…"
Wednesday
The Hiker replied to Jason Grecco's discussion 'Gulfport Shugert Utica Thickness'
"The report page shows they hit the Utica at 8594' and then the Point Pleasant at 8883 ft.  There is no bottom to the PP listed, which is too bad, because that's usually what they are after.... (Your link would not work for me, so I…"
Wednesday
Donald replied to Jason Grecco's discussion 'Gulfport Shugert Utica Thickness'
"Is this new info, or has it been out? I have not heard this before."
Wednesday
Jason Grecco posted a discussion

Gulfport Shugert Utica Thickness

According to the well log for Gulfport's Shugert 1-H1 the Utica has a thickness of 1011 feet.  Is this correct or mistake in logging?  Could this explain the production value of this well?   I didnt think the Utica exceeded 300 feet in thickness in Ohio.  I guess it is possible that a Middle Ordovician deposition occurred in a pre-Ordovician valley.   Apparently there is some good value to seismic studies.See More
Wednesday
Jason Grecco replied to jeffery mclaughlin's discussion 'Pipeline pictures Beaver twp Noble County Ohio'
"Are they installing two 12 inch pipes or one?"
Wednesday
Jason Grecco replied to Booger's discussion 'WTF DNR?'
"Freedom of Information Requests is a real legal request.  But you must be specific on what you are requesting.  For example, You can request specific production results from specific wells, but vague requests may get a vague response."
May 10
Jason Grecco replied to searcherone's discussion '138 Pipelines planned for Ohio'
"MW better get subs that know what they are doing.....OEPA fines will far exceed landowner issues....great link."
May 1
wyalusing jim and Jason Grecco are now friends
May 1
Jason Grecco replied to bo boboski's discussion 'ODNR On VACATION?'
"I talked to an inspector today and he indicated that some of the producers where late with providing logs and data.  They are now struggling to get the data entered.  I wont make excuses for ODNR, but we need to keep in mind the historical…"
May 1
Jason Grecco replied to Hunter's discussion 'Contacted by MarkWest for pipeline easement in Harrison county.' in the group Harrison County, OH
"Al: You know not many people use their real name like you and I do.....you would think that more people would talk about their ROW deals since they conceal their Identity................."
Apr 29
Jason Grecco replied to Hunter's discussion 'Contacted by MarkWest for pipeline easement in Harrison county.' in the group Harrison County, OH
"Hey Chris: Did MW start installing pipe on your land yet heading south to the Cadiz Industrial Plant? Jason"
Apr 29
Jason Grecco replied to Utica Shale's discussion 'Landowners face challenges with new leasing rules ...'
"Joseph/Marcus: Your dead on with this assessment.  We all need to keep in mind that there is a huge amount of spending (lobbying) going on in Columbus to influence the state statue decision making.  We need to make our voice…"
Apr 29
Jason Grecco replied to BrianH's discussion 'Utica Production Potential Map'
"Marion????? How can there be enough reservoir pressure to horizontally drill and efficiently develope the Utica in Marion, Ohio???  This map cant be accurate................"
Apr 28
Jason Grecco replied to Tico's discussion 'UBELIEVABLE,, DID NOT SEE THIS COMING'
"With all these problems and reductions of royalties, should one consider selling 50% of their minerals.  Uncertainity of not getting into a drilling unit.  Unknown tax liability in the future.  BS market delivery deductions.  Why…"
Apr 26
Jason Grecco replied to Utica Shale's discussion 'Markwest / Cadiz Update ...'
"I believe that it will also produce unblended gasoline, that can be shipped to refineries for blending and distribution."
Apr 25

Profile Information

What is your role in the Marcellus?
Landowner
Why are you here?
Networking, Learning, Leasing Your Land
Which state(s) are you following?
Ohio
What shale plays do you follow?
Utica

Comment Wall (2 comments)

You need to be a member of Go Marcellus & Utica Shale: Leasing, Drilling & Mineral Rights to add comments!

Join Go Marcellus & Utica Shale: Leasing, Drilling & Mineral Rights

At 10:55pm on July 17, 2012, Patsy A. Andeson said…

Our meeting Sunday eve. we thought went great. Jim McEvoy represented MarkWest. He had met with my husband and I earlier that week with the land agent Fred Hines.

Jim seemed very knowledgeable and satsified all of our questions. He wrote in things to clarify on the lease/addendum. All present agreed that if he would come back with the $15 a foot for pipeline and $25 a foot for damages, we would sign. He told me he would be on the phone with MarkWest in Denver, CO and would call me on Monday with results.

Monday about 11:00 we had a message from a Noel Glenn ( I think that is the correct name) from Mark West. She stated she was the project manager for this pipeline and wanted to meet with me. We played phone tag till Tuesday eve. I then spent an hour on the phone with her. Totally frustrating. Seems like we are almost back an square one.  She said no way could she pay $15 and $25. She wanted to know if I could set up a meeting, have everyone bring their drivers' license and be prepared to sign.

I told her she'd better bring her best offer, cause as far as I was concerned this was their last chance, and the total of $40 a foot had been our asking price from day 1. She pretty much said this would just pull the plug on the whole project if we couldn't sign.

Will see how Sunday goes. I told her I would not speak for the rest of the group, but we would not sign for less. I wanted to tell her that after Sunday the price will go up $1.00 a foot a day for all the inconvenience they are causing.

Hope you don't mind my venting.  We will probably still tell her we won't sign without the atty. looking it over again.

Patsy

At 11:21am on July 15, 2012, Patsy A. Andeson said…

We are asking $15 a foot for the initial pipeline that is to be 20?. $25.00 a foot for damages. Any additional lines we asked for $10 a foot up to a 20" line. Anything over 20" would be $1.00 an inch (ex.: 24" line would be $24.00 a foot, 36" line would be $36.00). They have not agreed to this.

I would think with your timber you would want to get an appraisal for the value now, plus what you will lose for the future 30-40 years growth that you will never recapture. Then see if that would come close to the damages per foot or go for actual damages.

What they came back with so far is only pertaining to the add'l. lines and it states: "Should a subsequest line exceed 20" in diameter, GRANTEE shall pay an additional $1.00 per linear foot of right-of-way for each additional inch in diameter pipe outside of 20" (ie, 24" pipe would be paid at $14.00 per linear foot of right-of-way, in lieu of the $10.00 per foot rate)."

At this moment this is as clear as mud to me. I imagine we will let an atty. look over the lease again before signing, even though Mark West wants it signed by the end of the month.

Patsy Anderson

 
 
 

advertisements