I recently watched the movie "Hillary's America" I recommend every American see that. It explains the history of the democratic party and the rise of the Clintons. It talks about their views on the oil and gas industry and the war on coal and fossil fuels. I came away from that movie enlightened and disturbed. If she becomes our next POTUS we are in for trouble on a biblical scale. Our country will cease to exist as we know it. Has any one else on site seen this? 

Views: 11458

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Thank you for your post, RJMB.  I try very hard to keep up, am constantly reading and taking in information.  Yet that very critical connection (Hillary donations from OPEC and her anti-fracking stand) escaped me until reading what you wrote when the light finally went on.  Like with the Kahn con, remaining abreast of all this stuff is very challenging, and even more so given the unimaginable pro-Hillary bias of the American press.  

Right on RJMB!!!

I've been hearing republicans say that if so and so is elected, the country will cease to exist for 50+ years now.

You need to knock it off.

I'm not going to go into the numbers, but the by the numbers, the democrats not only don't destroy the country they make it more prosperous.

The attacks never stop, but the evidence is always weak.

Ted Nugent is your Goebbels.

Of course Hillary is corrupt, but no more so than all of the other politicians I've examined.

I'm voting for Trump but have zero fear of her being President. 

I'm hoping the Oil industry can get to her and she will help us.  She is very pro business and always has been.

I'd like to see a discussion of Ronald Reagan failing to respond when Iran's friends drove that truck into the Marines' housing killing a large number of them (200+).

Bin Laden said Reagan's failure to respond to the murder of American Servicemen was a major impetus in the development of Al Qaeda's ideology and belief that Americans were weak and could be successfully attacked.

Nancy Reagan was the conservatives' intellectual architect for the misadventure/boondoggle known as the war on drugs.

According to the eyewitness account of her daughter, Nancy Reagan was a stone cold junkie.  The daughter says the nerve damage which prevents her from smiling correctly was the result of a stiff right hand her mom gave her when she had run out of pills.

The greatest expansion of the government in history and the greatest reduction in personal freedom was the result of a war on drugs started by a junkie.

When are they going to release Reagan's and Nixon's medical records?

How about a drug test for all 1%ers.

I gave those two examples because they actually illustrate changes in life as we knew it for the worse, i.e., the development of Al Qaeda (originally bankrolled by Reagan) and the war on drugs which has turned the country into a Police/Security State.

You should also note that Bill Clinton couldn't respond to Al Qaeda as he was distracted by the vast right wing conspiracy which led up to his impeachment that was waged by the republican Taliban playing school marm.

That travesty was led by Dennis Hastert a married, closeted homosexual who preyed on his students, Newt Gingrich, arrived on the House floor for a vote fresh from an episode of  flagrante delicto with his mistress.  Those were just some of the  hypocrites casting stones at Wild Bill.

Paul, seriously:  are you on crack?

What part is in error Frank?

Paul Butler is so wrong, U apparently did NOT read my post or possibly understand it. Her belief system whereby government has all the answers is antithetical to our free markets. She develops policy based on who gives how much to her and NOT on what is good for America. Hillary has a long history proving Hillary puts herself above our laws and country. Do U think America was well served by the sale of Uranium One? If U are a supporter of institutionalized corruption, that is your choice, Trump supporters want to turn that corruption on its head...

As I understand things ALL are traits of elitist socialists / communists.

Citizens are mere subjects - subjects own nothing - the elite / government control any / all wealth.

NOT GOOD.

We will see.

You say Trump is the best thing since sliced bread and don't I want to believe you.

He might be more corrupt.

If it finally turns out that the Democrat Candidate is fraternizing with a member or members of the Muslim Brotherhood / said individual / individuals is affiliated / has ties to the M B (irrefutably / undeniably) our vote will be cast for the Republican Candidate.

Would like to see such proof as we cannot embrace the new Democrat doctrines / tenets we've read / heard about anyway.

Good luck to all of us - we all need it the way I see it.

All as always only IMHO.

It was Obama who was giving power to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt by giving them state of the art U.S. made heavy weapons.... Here's another fact.... Obama is using the Muslim Brotherhood to advise him on Islamic/Muslim issues/affairs.... Why would he give our enemy such power and welcome them into the White House? He is a traitor and a Muslim sympathizer..... Sickening that he gets away with it.

Very well stated, lance.  Extremists claim Obama is a Muslim.  I'm not so sure of that.  But there is no doubt whatsoever of his Muslim sympathies.  He dad was a Muslim and members of his extended family in Kenya are Muslims.  So it is really not a shock that he would be more sympathetic to Islam than is an average American.

In addition, Islam and Sharia law are wholly incompatible with time-tested American values and with our Constitution.  This is something highly valued and sought after by the American left, with their intense desire to undermine and tear down traditional America.  Why do they dislike our Constitution?  It's because America's Constitution limits the powers of government, and leftists want to GROW the power of government.  So what better way to apply the wrecking ball to our country and enhance disruption here than by importing massive numbers of Muslim people.

Finally, nobody is claiming the Muslims being imported are wealthy;  far from it.  So where is the money coming from to build all these new American mosques?  It is coming straight from Saudi Arabia.  A key tenant of Sharia is spreading of the religion . . by force if necessary.  What amazes me is that in Europe, and now increasingly here in the heartland of America, no force has been necessary.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service