I HAVE BEEN CONTACTED BY ECLIPSE ABOUT AMMENDING MY CONTRACT ALONG WITH SEVERAL OTHERS IN MONROE COUNTY OHIO. MY CONTRACT IS SIMILAR TO THE SEOLA CONTRACT DONE BY JENNIFER GARRISON. THEY WANT TO PAY ME IN ADVANCE $1,000 AN ACRE TO CHANGE MY CONTRACT TO 5 -0NE YEAR EXTENSIONS INSTEAD OF THE $5,000 AN ACRE FOR THE ONE TIME RENEWAL. MY CONTRACT DOES NOT EXPIRE FOR ANOTHER18 MONTHS. I UNDERSTAND WHY THEY WANT TO DO THIS, BUT THE AMMENDMENT IS SEVERAL PAGES LONG. I LIKE THE CONTRACT THE WAY IT IS WRITTEN NOW AND I AM AFRAID THE WORDING CAN CHANGE OTHER PARTS OF MY CONTRACT. I AM IN CONTACT WITH MY LAWYER TO DISCUSS THIS, BUT I WAS WONDERING WHAT OTHERS IN MONROE COUNTY SIGNED WITH ECLIPSE THINK OF THE WORDING OF THIS AMMENDMENT.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Philip Brutz on January 27, 2016 at 4:33am In article 2 of MISCELLANEOUS, they added "oil, gas and other minerals on or underlying the Leased Premises unto Lessee"
Other minerals could mean just about anything. I still own my coal rights, if I were to sign this would I be giving them up?
Permalink Reply by luke s on January 27, 2016 at 8:52am JUST RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM ECLIPSE GIVING ME TILL NEXT WEDNESDAY TO SIGN AMENDMENT OR THIS OFFER IS OFF THE TABLE, AND THEY SAID THE NEXT OFFER WOULD BE HALF
Permalink Reply by bo boboski on January 27, 2016 at 9:18am Usually when they use pressure and time limits to get you to sign something its not a very good idea to sign!
Permalink Reply by searcherone on January 27, 2016 at 1:04pm a good grape on the vine says pressure could be on because SEOLA may have worked out something for their signers
Permalink Reply by Barry D on January 27, 2016 at 1:59pm luke s,
That's called desperation.
The threat doesn't even make sense if you won't sign at the current offer why would you sign at a lesser amount?
Desperation pure and simple.
A lot of times budgets come in to play and offers are lowered across the board. Not unusual.
Permalink Reply by Barry D on January 27, 2016 at 4:34am Fast,
I am not an attorney (although I play one on TV). I suggest anyone contemplating this agreement consult an attorney.
Having read a copy of the agreement, there is a clause that states that all other terms of the lease remain in force. At least that is my interpretation.
Permalink Reply by searcherone on January 26, 2016 at 4:29pm Olive Sue, if one signs the amendment it means that it is on a year to year basis and they can do that for five years. Eclipse could pay for the first year and drop the lease after that year. A landowner would receive no more money. There is no guarantee of five years, they just have the option to do that, but they don't have to. Landowner would get one fifth of the money and might not receive the other four fifths.
Jeff replied to Petroleum Attorney 1976's discussion 'FYI- Mineral Owners in the State of Ohio (Utica Shale area's)'
dean alan wohnhas replied to John W. Howard, CPL's discussion 'the Marcellus Shale - Its History and Importance to Both Appalachia and America'
Brett replied to John W. Howard, CPL's discussion 'the Marcellus Shale - Its History and Importance to Both Appalachia and America'
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com