Just noticed at the Ashtabula Co recorders office, NELA has released most all their Leases. Does anyone know what is going on???
Tags:
Supposedly, based on Halcon's comments about their northern Utica wells, and BP's supposed well results in northern Trumbull, Nela doesn't believe it can flip its acreage within the primary term of its leases. So, it is releasing the leases rather than hold the landowners hostage to them. Apparently those landowners will be getting letters explaining this in the next couple days. Don't know if this is true as it is secondhand, but that is what I was told by someone who had just spoken to Nela.
Apparently the Utica isn't thick enough here. The test wells were duds.
 Permalink Reply by Craig Stull on December 6, 2013 at 6:19am
Permalink Reply by Craig Stull on December 6, 2013 at 6:19am    Same thing is going on with NELA in Trumbull county!!
Jim-- I didn't get that much detail, probably from the same source! Yes they are releasing land owners.
 Permalink Reply by elliemae82 on December 7, 2013 at 4:05pm
Permalink Reply by elliemae82 on December 7, 2013 at 4:05pm    Has NELA ever made any deals in the past for anyone? Or was this a new group?
 Permalink Reply by Joe on December 8, 2013 at 3:16am
Permalink Reply by Joe on December 8, 2013 at 3:16am    Of all the post I have read on this page, I find this one the hardest to understand.
I received many mailings from NELA, never found any of them attractive. Always seemed more like a high priced, high pressure flipper, than a landowners group. They wanted twice the commission, and a five year commitment. Sorry, If you want to tie up my property for five years, you will need to send a check.
What would cause a company with a business plan like this to suddenly release leases years before they are required to do so? After recording at the county, I not aware of any ongoing cost they would incur. There was the water testing. I not sure how that was paid for or when it was done, but if NELA paid for it you would think they would hang on to the end.
I can only think of a few reasons. 1, My understanding of what it cost to maintain a lease is incorrect. 2, Some government agency has found a way, and will soon implement a recurring fee on a leaseholder that does not require production. 3, They were or will be paid to do so. 4, They are truly a benevolent organization, and despite the cost to date are willing to free all lessors to sign with other companies. 4 scares me the most as it will require me to question my entire understanding of the universe.
 Permalink Reply by Joe on December 8, 2013 at 8:50am
Permalink Reply by Joe on December 8, 2013 at 8:50am     Permalink Reply by B-Man on December 8, 2013 at 10:38am
Permalink Reply by B-Man on December 8, 2013 at 10:38am    Joe, unfortunately i read this the same way. somewhat depressing!!
 Permalink Reply by Melinda on December 12, 2013 at 2:17am
Permalink Reply by Melinda on December 12, 2013 at 2:17am     Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on December 11, 2013 at 10:16am
Permalink Reply by Joseph-Ohio on December 11, 2013 at 10:16am    
    © 2025               Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).             
    Powered by
     
    
| h2 | h2 | h2 | 
|---|---|---|
| AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] | Links | 
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com