Has anyone else heard that there is another layer under the Utica? Something to think about if you are selling your mineral rights.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Laura on March 2, 2014 at 5:38am
Permalink Reply by bo boboski on March 2, 2014 at 10:24am Swepi/Shell is looking at 26, count em,26 formations on one of their PA. well pads.
Permalink Reply by catt on March 2, 2014 at 12:55pm You can put in your lease that you only want to lease the Utica/Marcellus.......all others, if they choose to drill them will have to be purchased by the oil/gas company.
Permalink Reply by Kathleen on March 3, 2014 at 3:54am
Permalink Reply by Susan A Tippel on March 3, 2014 at 6:52am What is the point pleasant? How many formations are there?
Permalink Reply by Kathleen on March 3, 2014 at 7:01am
Permalink Reply by Tom on March 7, 2014 at 6:14am There should be no reason you couldn't get depth restrictions in your lease. I just signed in January and got a restriction from the top of the Marcellus to just below the bottom of the Trenton/Black River.
Permalink Reply by Richard Droske on March 7, 2014 at 6:31am Absolutely, any lease for mineral rights should specify the depths included. Of course the lessor will base the offer on what is included and may not make an offer if the depth restrictions do not fit into their plans. Part of the negotiations and just another important reason to have a good attorney involved on your behalf. You know what they say about the man who represents himself in court... applies to mineral leases as well.
Permalink Reply by bo boboski on March 9, 2014 at 8:09am I do believe that if a landowner gets to thinking they are so smart that they want to start telling the o&g co.s what layer they can drill, pugh clauses,time limits,etc. they may find themselves on the outside,looking in. You've seen some of the weird shaped production unit maps? some of those parcels that were left out may have been one of those guys!
Permalink Reply by Tom on March 9, 2014 at 10:32am And you would rather see what????? See the landowner screwed over once again by the big business that is G&O?
Every situation is different, a well educated landowner should 1) have the advice of a good attorney, and 2) know how far that they can push the negotiations.
Permalink Reply by bo boboski on March 9, 2014 at 10:48am Well educated is good, greedy, no. I know of some landowners who would;nt sign when their neighbors did, good leases ,but since they thought they could hold out for more, are still not leased and may never be with their present demands.
Jeff replied to Petroleum Attorney 1976's discussion 'FYI- Mineral Owners in the State of Ohio (Utica Shale area's)'
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com