Shell reps has just come through to get permission for seismic testing. I'm not leased (total surprise to them...I guess landowners aren't the only ones kept in the dark!), so I said no. I said I would be interested in leasing, and they said Shell would get back to me soon.
Does anyone know Shell's current standard offer? The last I heard (late last year) it was $2000/acre, 15% royalty. And they have addendums for C&G rollbacks, no storage, and some other environmental ones. I want to be prepared when they call to get the best deal. I'd like to hold out for a higher royalty; I know that Shell has bought/taken over leases with royalties as high as 20%. As I've written before, I'm in a pretty good position where it would be difficult for Shell to totally ignore my property. I want a deal, but I want better than their standard offer: now is my chance. Any ideas?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by William Constantine on September 29, 2011 at 11:53pm
Permalink Reply by Lynn Wigglesworth on September 30, 2011 at 2:08am Shell is still leasing (I just signed), but I think they are only leasing properties that they need for seismic testing or to fill out units. I don't worry too much about my water; I already had some bad stuff in it and had to put in a reverse osmosis filter. Have you tested for barium, strontium, etc? Barium is naturally high in some well water all over this area.
Does anyone really get a better deal from Shell/Swepi when they have a lawyer? From everything I've heard, they don't change their terms for anyone, and they only allow certain addenda no matter how high-powered your lawyer is. I negotiated on my own and got the deal I wanted (the standard $2000/15%, but a true non-surface lease, which eliminated 90% of my concerns about protecting my property)
Permalink Reply by Wayne D on September 30, 2011 at 3:11am
Permalink Reply by Lynn Wigglesworth on September 30, 2011 at 3:27am
Permalink Reply by William Constantine on September 30, 2011 at 9:11am
Permalink Reply by William Constantine on October 2, 2011 at 11:46pm
Permalink Reply by paleface on October 3, 2011 at 1:08am
Permalink Reply by Lynn Wigglesworth on September 30, 2011 at 3:31am
Permalink Reply by Lynn Wigglesworth on October 4, 2011 at 11:35am They haven't gotten here yet with the GPS...it's been raining, so that might be slowing them down. The last I heard is that they don't expect to be finished until next spring.
There was a paperwork problem with my lease, so it didn't get sent to Shell until sometime last week. There is another unit south of me that they could extend to include my property, but putting me in the Kennedy unit would make the most sense, since my property reaches almost half way across the unit, blocking at least one bore.
As far as I know, they didn't do the 3D seismic at the Butler or Baker sites or anywhere in this area yet. They have East's 2D tests, and that must be what they are using now to determine where to drill.
Permalink Reply by Lynn Wigglesworth on October 5, 2011 at 3:08am
Permalink Reply by William Ladd on October 4, 2011 at 12:13pm Lynn, are you anywhere near Ely hill road?
Bill
aka Bummy
Jeff replied to Petroleum Attorney 1976's discussion 'FYI- Mineral Owners in the State of Ohio (Utica Shale area's)'
dean alan wohnhas replied to John W. Howard, CPL's discussion 'the Marcellus Shale - Its History and Importance to Both Appalachia and America'
© 2026 Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).
Powered by
| h2 | h2 | h2 |
|---|---|---|
AboutWhat makes this site so great? Well, I think it's the fact that, quite frankly, we all have a lot at stake in this thing they call shale. But beyond that, this site is made up of individuals who have worked hard for that little yard we call home. Or, that farm on which blood, sweat and tears have fallen. [ Read More ] |
Links |
Copyright © 2017 GoMarcellusShale.com