My wife and I  have been watching the news about the copper miners that were trapped by a rock fall in Chile.  Several countries send in all kinds of equipment that was useful to drill 2500 feet or more to provide food and water and many other life saving items to these 33 miners.

 

Squabbling was kept at a minimum or was non existant. Everyone worked together for these 33 men. Nothing has been mentioned as far as I can ascertain which drilling company rig was going to be set up or who was going to pay for the entire operation. I would suspect that many manhours will or have been spent free gratis without a thought of being repaid. It was enough just to know that their efforts were extremely useful in the rescue of these men who they did not know.

 

The president of Chile is on site. He did not decide to take off on an extended vacation or around the world trip to visit other countries and their dignatries during this rescue. This president and the other authorities did not try to hide their plight from the world. They asked for, and received help from  experienced help around the world.

 

The rescue attempt was well thought out. It has not been hurried. Some of the equipment used was not "Leading edge tecnology." The onlookers have been respectful and have stayed out of the way.

 

CNN has stayed with this rescue operation continously. The other channels have picked up the other news stories and break in when necessary with the rescue story.

 

 

My thought here is, why cant the marcellus play situation be solved without all of the bickering "hair pulling"  and other crap, to make life easier for all of the peoples of the world just as is being done for these trapped miners?????

 

Bill L.

aka Bummy

Views: 318

Replies to This Discussion

Don't have an answer but very much appreciate reading your very well thought out post. I had many of the same thoughts while watching the coverage last evening. The country of Chile can be very happy for the example that they and their president have exhibited to the world.
I look forward to reading replies to your post. I apologize for not being a contributor as yet. I am very much in the learning stage.
I, too, thought it was a very well-thought-out response to that crisis. It showed honesty and hard work and concern from all over the world. I'm so glad it's progressing so well.

The Marcellus...well, that's just business. Everyone's in it to get the most that they can; we have a valuable resource, and they want it. It's a matter of how badly they want it and what we are willing to settle for. People aren't so altruistic when nobody's life is in danger and there's a buck to be made. I think all we, as landowners, can do is try to get our elected officials fighting on our side so they don't sell us out to the O&G companies. As long as we have the freedom to make any deal with can (or not deal at all if we choose), I think that's the best we can expect.
Thank for your comments Lynn and Diane Kosmalski. ( And Diane, dont worry about being in the learning stage. Everyone is in that learning stage. Some of us are just a little farther along!)

Being a little altrustic, Lynn is not so bad. It is much better then the greed we are looking at or seeing that is coming from the people in authority. Personally, I never had much in the way of wealth. But what I did have was shared with needy folks, and still is.

A problem did arise one time.

The needy people looked at me and said, "What is Bill after? What does he want?" Well Lynn I was trying to resume being a member of my community and reestablish old friendships after spending time in the military. I felt like an outcast!

But I am not going to get into that discussion here.

My purpose here is to point out that many of the land owners only want their fair share of the riches that the state of Pennsylvania has. We have paid taxes and scratched the land for a pretty meager living. And now that many of the financially wizards have contaminated and destroyed their own "nests" so to speak, they wish to rob us, the folks who tried to preserve our own areas!

Bill L.
aka Bummy
"My purpose here is to point out that many of the land owners only want their fair share of the riches that the state of Pennsylvania has. We have paid taxes and scratched the land for a pretty meager living. And now that many of the financially wizards have contaminated and destroyed their own "nests" so to speak, they wish to rob us, the folks who tried to preserve our own areas!"

Bill; I don't really understand your attitude. No one is 'robbing' anyone. People are entering legally-binding contracts of their own free will. The goal of the O&G company is to keep as much of their profits as they can; our goal is to get as much of their profit (in the form of bonus and royalty) as WE can. If what I'm offered doesn't seem fair to me, no deal.

If you had your house on the market for $100,000 and someone offered you $50,000, it's your option to accept it or tell them to get lost and wait for a better deal. If you accept the $50,000 offer and do the deal, you can't come back later and whine that you were robbed. Even if, years later, you find out that your house is now worth a lot more than you sold it for, it was a legitimate contract, agreed to by both sides, and certainly not the buyer's fault if you feel cheated.
Lynn! lets not let this discussion deteriorate into a personal Squabble.

A legally binding contract is great. But when ALL of the facts are not presented to you and you have not the ability to dig them out for yourself and the only option you might have is to hire a very expensive lawyer, which you cannot really afford, that may or may not have your best interest in mind as he works. Then you have little chance of coming out in one piece.

Putting in in another way.

Yo have a calf. you are a youngster. You are working your butt off providing the best hay, the best grain and the best housing possible. That calf grows up. That animal trusts you and has an average life style. But in your mind you are planning something else not in his best interest!

Now you are grown up. You lead your animal to a new barn. BANG! you have taken the life of your animal just to butcher him out and eat him.

Lets change this a little bit. The animal is a human being and not a different specie. The basic story is exactly the same. Is it morally right for one human being to do this to another?

Please understand I do not mean butcher him out in a literal sense, only figuretivly speaking. But that is what is taking place.

We are talking about leasing, not buying, Lynn!
Bill; I don't have a clue what you are talking about.
Of course you can't relate what I am saying. Not many people can. Try this,

Many land owners have been CUT to pieces by unscrupulous Oil and gas speculators and other financial wizards who had better information then the landowner was.

The accumulation of great wealth seems to be the sole purpose for some folks. But life is much more then having a fat pocketbook

CUT or BUTCHERED

Bill L.
aka Bummy
Bill, IMO Lynn is right on with this one. My family has been signing leases for the past 40 years. Most have been for $1.00 to $5.00 per acre and most have been straight 10 year leases. Were they fair offers then compared to now? Ya IMO. My parents never gave much thought to any of it because until the last really 8 years there was never any serious drilling ever taking place. The game has certainly changed now and rightfully so people need to do their homework. I have consulted 3 different attorney's over the years and for the most part they have never told me anything that I haven't already researched myself. In fact two of them gave me addendum clauses that did not even pertain to my land.

Fact is these leases are legal contracts and given recent development they should not be taken lightly in any way. If you aren't comfortable with the terms wait it out. Your minerals aren't going anywhere unless you get spaced out which IMO is a complete violation of ones property rights. But it is legal in PA currently.
Also, in the case of mineral rights, there's very little difference between leasing and selling. If you read a lease, the rights belong to the O&G company until they decide to return them...as long as they fulfill the terms of the lease (lease payments, or royalty or shut-in payments, or whatever the terms are), they hold your rights forever.
There certainly is alot to learn before signing a lease.
I am doing as much homework as time allows and appreciate all of the input on this forum.
There is a huge difference between morally right and legally right. I think that many folks would say that what is being done legally is not necessarily the proper thing thing to do when conditions change.

Bill L.
aka Bummy
Unfortunately today's world will stomp on those expecting to be treated morally correctly. The landmen I've spoken to have stated very simply that this is what I can and can not offer to you. I've been told that what is offered today could be rescinded tomorrow and also that what isn't offered could be agreed to down the road depending any number of factors that these companies consider when trying to get that lease at the best deal possible.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Keith Mauck (Site Publisher).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service